the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Reducing Risk Together: moving towards a more holistic approach to multi-(hazard-)risk assessment and management
Abstract. Moving towards a more holistic approach to disaster risk management, in which a multi-(hazard-)risk approach is central, offers many opportunities to increase society’s resilience. In 2022, we presented a research agenda of six points that could contribute towards this paradigm shift. In this paper we synthesise key learnings from the MYRIAD-EU project - which ran from September 2021 to December 2025 - reflecting on progress and challenges faced in pursuing this research agenda, and share perspectives that may help to further improve multi-(hazard-)risk assessment and management. Going forward, we point to several avenues for continued scientific research: continue the mainstreaming and mutual understanding of concepts and definitions; continue developing a strong evidence base of how multi-(hazard-)risk both shapes, and is shaped by, risk dynamics over space and time; further developing methods for providing both current and future multi-(hazard-)risk scenarios; increasing the availability of appropriate, solutions-oriented, usable tools; more explicitly including equity issues and equitable disaster risk reduction and adaptation; continue extensively testing and coproducing multi-(hazard-)risk knowledge in in-depth case studies; supporting the development of Multi-Hazard Early Warning Systems; and strengthening opportunities for Early Career Researcher leadership and empowerment within project structures. We suggest concrete ways to advance on these topics in future years and decades.
Competing interests: Some authors are members of the editorial board of Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.- Preprint
(1091 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 10 Feb 2026)
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-5897', Alan Tan, 13 Jan 2026 reply
-
RC2: 'Review of "Reducing Risk Together: moving towards a more holistic approach to multi-(hazard-)risk assessment and management"', Maximillian Van Wyk de Vries, 17 Jan 2026
reply
Please see the attached pdf for the review.
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 341 | 111 | 15 | 467 | 27 | 24 |
- HTML: 341
- PDF: 111
- XML: 15
- Total: 467
- BibTeX: 27
- EndNote: 24
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
General comments on manuscript
This manuscript highlighted the learnings gained and challenges faced in research conducted on multi-hazards risk assessment and management undertaken in the MYRIAD-EU project. The manuscript was well-written with key points easy to understand and follow. Although the manuscript did not discuss any technical approaches in details, due to the limitation of the imposed length of the manuscript and the number of contributions made throughout the project, highlighted approaches were well-cited and easy to follow if readers wants to find out more details about those approaches.
Specific comments:
The authors highlighted valuable learnings and challenges that are beneficial and insightful for DRM researchers looking to apply their research to create real world impacts in practice. Some highlighted key learnings (scientific) includes:
Some key learnings that extend beyond scientific research but is useful for DRM-MR researchers to consider:
The authors also highlighted relevant challenges faced in their MR research journey, pointing towards potential areas for future work in advancing our capabilities and understanding in multi-hazards:
While the authors have also highlighted some future directions for research, such as development of multi-hazards early warning systems, I would appreciate it even more if the authors were able to provide, from their perspective and experience in multi-hazards research, what is currently missing or challenges that are obstacles to the successful development and adoption of multi-hazards early warning systems in real-world.