the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
The Spatial and Temporal Distribution Patterns of XCH₄ in Iran: New Insights from TROPOMI Observations
Abstract. The unprecedented increase in methane concentration, as the second most important greenhouse gas after carbon dioxide, poses a serious challenge to climate change mitigation policies, while accurate and comprehensive monitoring remains insufficient in many countries, including Iran. This study investigates the spatial and temporal patterns of column-averaged methane in Iran using satellite-based observations from Tropospheric Monitoring Instrument on the Sentinel-5P satellite during 2019–2024 and compares them with data from the Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research database. On average, XCH₄ concentrations across Iran increased from 1872.6 ± 11.9 ppb in 2019 to 1918.6 ± 11.2 ppb in 2024, representing a +46.1 ± 16.4 ppb rise over six years. All uncertainty estimates represent standard deviations, with a mean value of 12.3 ppb. Statistical and spatial analyses, including Global Moran’s I (0.914–0.982, p < 0.01), Local Moran’s I, and the Getis-Ord Gi* hotspot analysis, confirmed that methane concentrations in Iran exhibit a significant clustering pattern. Hotspots were mainly observed in Class 1: Northern Agro-Hotspots (Gilan, Mazandaran, and Golestan), Class 2: Central Urban-Dense Hotspots, and Class 3: Southern Industrial-Fossil Hotspots, whereas Class 4: Low-Emission Provinces and Class 5: Very-Low-Emission Provinces exhibited lower concentrations with sparse hotspots, located mostly in western and eastern Iran. The highest seasonal averages were recorded in summer (1914.3 ± 13.1 ppb) and autumn (1910.5 ± 13.5 ppb). Comparison with EDGAR data indicates that several major emission sources are underestimated, and spatial overlaps with the observed hotspots did not exceed 5 % in any month. Satellite observations reveal discrepancies in hotspot locations and emission magnitudes, emphasizing that relying solely on modeled inventories may misrepresent methane emissions.
- Preprint
(1944 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(907 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 21 Feb 2026)
-
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-5852', Argha Ghosh, 11 Jan 2026
reply
-
AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Ali Rahimi, 21 Jan 2026
reply
Thank you very much for your detailed, thoughtful, and highly constructive comments. We sincerely appreciate your positive evaluation of our study and your valuable suggestions, which will greatly enhance the clarity, scientific rigor, and overall quality of the manuscript. We have carefully read the paper you recommended and found it extremely relevant and insightful, and we are truly grateful for this excellent reference.
Your comments regarding methodological transparency, validation between datasets, and the interpretation of spatial variability in methane concentrations in relation to environmental and land-surface drivers are particularly helpful. These suggestions provide important guidance for strengthening both the analytical framework and the discussion of our results. We will carefully address all of your points and incorporate them into the revised manuscript to improve its robustness and impact.
Thank you again for your time and valuable input.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5852-AC1
-
AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Ali Rahimi, 21 Jan 2026
reply
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-5852', Anonymous Referee #1, 01 Feb 2026
reply
Please find the comments in the attached Supplementary file.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Ali Rahimi, 04 Feb 2026
reply
Dear Referee,
Thank you very much for your valuable comments. We appreciate your careful review and will carefully consider your suggestions in our revision. Your feedback will be taken into account to improve the paper
We are currently revising the paper and will resubmit a fully revised version soon.Best regards,
Ali RahimiCitation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5852-AC2
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Ali Rahimi, 04 Feb 2026
reply
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 208 | 103 | 32 | 343 | 36 | 9 | 11 |
- HTML: 208
- PDF: 103
- XML: 32
- Total: 343
- Supplement: 36
- BibTeX: 9
- EndNote: 11
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
The Manuscript contains substantial research findings on the tropospheric methane concentration and hotspot identification. However, inclusion of some additional information would enhance the quality and clarity of the research as follows:
1. The process of hotspot identification was described in a very qualitative manner like using higher or lower values in Section 2.3.2. For better understanding and clarity the exact threshold values for differentiating the higher and lower values should be mentioned. A table representing the high and lower threshold values may be added.
2. Cite proper references for Global and Local Spatial Autocorrelation Analysis and hotspot analysis.
3. The validation between the two data source may be shown.
4. The research shows methane concentration over an entire country. Therefore, some reasons behind the high or low concentration should be included (with respect to hydro-meteorological variables, topographic variation, land use pattern etc. because these influence the methane concentration). Methane concentration pattern over different land use or topographic regime may be shown. The author can follow similar research if found suitable (https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-025-00666-5).