Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5841
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5841
09 Dec 2025
 | 09 Dec 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).

AI based seasonal large ensembles for fluvial flood risk: Evaluation over the Elbe basin

John Ashcroft, Alison Poulston, Marius Koch, Georg Ertl, Kirsty Brown, James Butler, Anthony Hammond, Owen Jordan, Sarah Warren, Rob Lamb, Paul J. Young, and David Wood

Abstract. A key challenge in risk analysis is to identify hazard events that are plausible and yet extrapolate beyond historical observations with appropriate frequency. For flood risk management, this can be done with large ensembles of synthetic, physically plausible weather scenarios that extend beyond the historical record to sample low-likelihood, high-impact events. Traditional statistical approaches for synthetic weather generation are often limited in variability and physical realism. Here, we show for the first time that a machine learning weather prognostic model, combined with a diagnostic precipitation model, can generate seasonal-scale ensembles suitable for flood risk assessment. Specifically, we adapt the huge ensembles (HENS) approach using a Spherical Fourier Neural Operator (SFNO)-based model combined with an Adaptive Fourier Neural Operator (AFNO)-based diagnostic precipitation model, using Nvidia Earth-2 stack, in a framework which we call “PrecipHENS”, to produce >1000 synthetic European winter seasons of precipitation and temperature at 0.25° resolution in 112 GPU hours on NVIDIA L40s GPUs. In an Elbe River case study, PrecipHENS reproduces key features of the precipitation and temperature climatology, preserves spatial and temporal dependence – including decay of extremal co‑occurrence with distance – and generates a wider diversity of extreme events than an industry-standard conditional multivariate extreme value model benchmark. Principal component analysis of extreme precipitation fields shows that PrecipHENS spans a much broader space of storm structures (≈81% of 1×1 grid cells) than the benchmark (≈50%) or the historical record (≈19%), indicating plausible novelty rather than repetition of past patterns. Coupled with a hydrological model, the AI-generated weather sequences produce river flow simulations consistent with historical climatology and extreme discharge patterns. These results demonstrate the potential of AI-based weather models to support event set generation for flood hazard and risk applications. Beyond flood risk, such AI-based large-ensemble weather generation offers a general framework for applications that benefit from expanding the physically plausible sample space, including risk assessment, climate-impact analysis, storyline development and statistical characterisation of extremes.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
John Ashcroft, Alison Poulston, Marius Koch, Georg Ertl, Kirsty Brown, James Butler, Anthony Hammond, Owen Jordan, Sarah Warren, Rob Lamb, Paul J. Young, and David Wood

Status: open (until 20 Jan 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
John Ashcroft, Alison Poulston, Marius Koch, Georg Ertl, Kirsty Brown, James Butler, Anthony Hammond, Owen Jordan, Sarah Warren, Rob Lamb, Paul J. Young, and David Wood
John Ashcroft, Alison Poulston, Marius Koch, Georg Ertl, Kirsty Brown, James Butler, Anthony Hammond, Owen Jordan, Sarah Warren, Rob Lamb, Paul J. Young, and David Wood
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 09 Dec 2025
Download
Short summary
Floods cause major social and economic losses, but estimating risk is difficult because extreme events are rare. We used artificial intelligence to generate over a thousand realistic winter weather seasons and river flows for the Elbe basin. The approach reproduced observed patterns and produced a wider range of extreme storms, showing that artificial intelligence can expand plausible flood scenarios for improved risk assessment.
Share