the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Review article: Past and future climate–related hazards in Indonesia
Abstract. Indonesia, one of the most populous countries, ranked fifth globally for climate-related hazards and disasters in the past five years. This study aims to assess historical trends, future projections, and potential implications of climate-related hazards in Indonesia. We synthesize literature, analyze historical datasets, and examine CMIP projections to assess the trend of extreme climate events and their potential effects on climate hazards. Results show that current records and studies predominantly highlight floods as the most common hazard in the tropical–humid region, followed by landslides, droughts, extreme weather, and wildfires. Historical evidence indicates an increasing threat of flood by intensifying amplitude and frequency of rainfall extremes by around 25 %, especially in most northern parts of Indonesia (Kalimantan, northern Sumatera, parts of Sulawesi, and Papua), while the drought amplified by 60 % over the country across the dry regions from southern Sumatera, Java to Nusa Tenggara. These trends are projected to persist under future climate scenarios (SSPs or RCPs). We found that urban factors like land subsidence and landuse change, particularly in cities like Jakarta, may worsen flood impacts in the future. Future studies should also examine rainfall-induced landslides and flash floods in other vulnerable areas, such as steep areas. Additionally, drought, often overlooked in this country, requires comprehensive research given its unique slow onset and its agricultural and societal effects. Global teleconnection mechanisms (ENSO, IOD, MJO) have intensified wet and dry hazards in recent decades and must be considered. A more integrated approach, combining cascading process models, impact assessments, early warning systems, and adaptive land-use practices, is essential to enhance resilience against climate hazards in Indonesia.
- Preprint
(2275 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(179 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 17 Jan 2026)
-
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-584', Ali S Akanda, 21 Dec 2025
reply
- This is a large and meticulous review of various climate related natural hazards in Indonesia. Previous review papers on this topic has highlighted the vulnerability of Indonesia in general terms - but this manuscript does a good job of categorizing and mapping them with appropriate climate extremes and geographical significance. On that note, this manuscript attempts to provide a type-by-type reviews of the many climate hazards faced by Indonesia, and as reported in current literature and IPCC publications. Lastly, the geographical representation of the hazards and a list including less discussed hazards in the context of Indonesia (droughts, wildfires, and storm surges) is appreciated.
- The manuscript performed an important task by including the effect of the global and regional teleconnections, ENSO/IOD/MJO, on the climate extremes. Most other reviews do not combine the effect of climate change and teleconnections when discussing extremes. This is an unique contribution of this paper.
- In the introduction section, the Greater Jakarta example should be expanded to include the issue of excessive groundwater withdrawal and land subsidence. This issue, although anthropogenic, combines with climate extremes to exacerbate flooding during the rainy season and water scarcity during the dry season (lower groundwater table due to excessive withdrawal and at the same time, reduced rate of recharge due to land cover conversion).
- The selection methodology for literature review has been explained well in the methods section. It is very important to understand the criteria and methodology employed in a review work with such a vast scope. Although the final tally of selected literature (35) was surprisingly low, the careful selection method starting with a much larger selection affirms that important publications were included.
- In Figure 1, should there be a connection between Extreme Precipitation and Storm Surge – do these two types coincide to cause more aggravated coastal damage?
- Are the Yearly Count or Number of Events reported in Figures 2 and 3 related? Are they supposed to be the same? Figure 2 says “cumulative” while Figure 3 does not, but the shapes of the curves are very similar.
- The opening sentence in Discussion: should it be a thorough “review?”
- The summary figure in the discussion (Figure 8) depicting the clustering phenomena is very helpful to bring the vast review and its contents in a concluding discussion. Similarly, Figures 4 and 6 are appreciated that show the different types of hazards and their geographic distributions and future projections.
ReplyCitation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-584-CC1
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,507 | 1,338 | 33 | 3,878 | 63 | 48 | 72 |
- HTML: 2,507
- PDF: 1,338
- XML: 33
- Total: 3,878
- Supplement: 63
- BibTeX: 48
- EndNote: 72
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1