Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5813
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5813
04 Dec 2025
 | 04 Dec 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).

Calibrating on Downscaled Satellite Soil Moisture Data Can Improve Watershed Model Performance in Predicting Soil Moisture Variability

Binyam Workeye Asfaw, Siam Maksud, Daniel R. Fuka, Amy S. Collick, Robin R. White, and Zachary M. Easton

Abstract. Watershed streamflow is often the focus of hydrological model calibration and evaluation, despite other potential objectives, including water quality management, flood protection, and agricultural management. When hydrological models are calibrated on streamflow, intermediate processes such as those affecting soil moisture are not necessarily well represented. This research evaluated the performance of downscaled and bias corrected soil moisture calibrated models against streamflow calibrated models both under single and multi-objective scenarios on field scale soil moisture estimation performance. Downscaled satellite soil moisture data and streamflow data are used to calibrate a Soil and Water Assessment Tool – Variable Source Area model initialized using topographic index classes to create hydrologic response units. In-situ soil moisture measurements at 25 locations across a 4-ha mixed-grass pasture located in southwestern Virginia were used to estimate field scale average soil moisture variability for model evaluation. Leveraging downscaled satellite soil moisture data substantially improved estimation of temporal soil moisture variability without affecting the model performance in estimating streamflow. The multi-objective calibration using streamflow and satellite soil moisture improved overall model performance both in estimating streamflow and soil moisture. A three-class topographic index hydrologic response unit definition allowed for adequate representation of saturation excess runoff process. Downscaling enabled calibration in a small 14 km2 watershed using coarse satellite soil moisture data.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Binyam Workeye Asfaw, Siam Maksud, Daniel R. Fuka, Amy S. Collick, Robin R. White, and Zachary M. Easton

Status: open (until 15 Jan 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Binyam Workeye Asfaw, Siam Maksud, Daniel R. Fuka, Amy S. Collick, Robin R. White, and Zachary M. Easton
Binyam Workeye Asfaw, Siam Maksud, Daniel R. Fuka, Amy S. Collick, Robin R. White, and Zachary M. Easton
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 04 Dec 2025
Download
Short summary
We tested whether calibrating watershed models with downscaled satellite soil moisture improves predictions of soil moisture and streamflow. Using machine learning to refine satellite data, we found that incorporating soil moisture in calibration enhanced both soil moisture and streamflow estimates, reducing uncertainty. This approach can support water management in small or ungauged basins worldwide.
Share