the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Stratosphere–Troposphere Exchange and Surface Ozone Pollution over Tropical Regions: A Case Study of Rossby Wave Breaking and Tropopause Folding
Abstract. Stratosphere-troposphere exchange (STE) is a key process by which ozone-rich stratospheric air enters the troposphere, influencing surface air quality. This study analyses an atypical STE event over North America between 6 and 14 March 2016, coinciding with a Phase I ozone contingency in Mexico City. Using ERA5 reanalysis, potential vorticity (PV) diagnostics, ozone tracers, Lagrangian trajectories, and isentropic analyses, the event is linked to anticyclonic Rossby wave breaking, a cut-off low, and a persistent tropopause fold. Deep intrusions of high-PV air reached mid- and lower-tropospheric levels, with maximum downward transport one day before the contingency. Equatorward wave amplification enabled coherent isentropic transport, allowing ozone-rich air to descend efficiently over elevated basins in Mexico. Backward trajectories confirmed stratospheric origins, while isentropic advection quantified quasi-horizontal transport along 320–340 K surfaces. Tropopause folding, strengthened by the subtropical jet and local topography, contributed an ozone mixing ratio of ~8 × 10-8 kg kg-1 near the surface, acting as a precursor to exceedance levels. The study also identifies recurrent tropopause folds preceding high-ozone episodes, underscoring the recurring influence of STE on regional air quality. These findings highlight how topography, Rossby wave dynamics, and quasi-horizontal transport pathways modulate surface ozone at low tropical latitudes. These emphasize the importance of monitoring synoptic precursors and incorporating STE diagnostics into high-resolution air quality forecasts to improve prediction in complex subtropical environments. This case demonstrates how mid-latitude disturbances can directly affect tropical air quality during boreal winter–spring.
- Preprint
(13236 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(46525 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-5743', Anonymous Referee #1, 03 Jan 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-5743/egusphere-2025-5743-RC1-supplement.pdfCitation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/egusphere-2025-5743-RC1 - AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Clemente Lopez-Bravo, 11 Feb 2026
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-5743', Anonymous Referee #2, 12 Jan 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-5743/egusphere-2025-5743-RC2-supplement.pdf
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Clemente Lopez-Bravo, 11 Feb 2026
-
EC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-5743', Roberto Rondanelli, 20 May 2026
Dear authors,
I am still waiting for a couple of additional reviews before reaching a final decision on the manuscript. However, I would like to alert the authors that, in my assessment, the manuscript does not yet provide a sufficiently convincing argument regarding the novelty and quantitative contribution of the work.
The role of tropopause folding and stratosphere–troposphere exchange (STE) in producing elevated ozone concentrations in high-elevation subtropical regions has been discussed for decades in the literature, including studies of ozone intrusions associated with upper-level troughs, cutoff lows, and deep tropopause folding events. The dynamical mechanisms described in the manuscript are therefore not entirely new in themselves.
What remains much less clear and what could constitute a substantial contribution of this paper, is the quantitative attribution of the observed ozone enhancements between direct stratospheric influence and in situ tropospheric photochemical production during the Mexico City episode. Given the current widespread availability of chemical transport models and online chemistry frameworks capable of separating these processes, I believe the manuscript would be significantly strengthened by including simulations performed with and without tropospheric photochemistry.
Such an analysis would provide a much clearer attribution of the ozone increases to STE processes and would allow the authors to quantify the extent to which stratospheric intrusions modulate urban ozone concentrations in a chemically active megacity environment. In my opinion, this additional analysis would move the paper from a largely qualitative dynamical interpretation toward a more robust mechanistic and quantitative contribution.
I am therefore inclined to request this additional analysis, as I believe it would substantially improve the manuscript and more convincingly demonstrate a genuine advance in our understanding of these episodes.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5743-EC1 -
AC3: 'Reply on EC1', Clemente Lopez-Bravo, 27 May 2026
Dear Roberto Rondanelli,Thank you for your constructive pre-assessment of the manuscript. We appreciate your recognition of the March 2016 event as a scientifically significant case of STE linked to Rossby wave breaking and tropopause folding over Mexico.We acknowledge that the dynamical mechanisms connecting tropopause folding, cutoff lows, and STE to elevated ozone levels are well established in the literature. Our manuscript does not claim a new STE mechanism. Instead, its novelty lies in the detailed dynamical and Lagrangian analysis of an unusually deep and persistent low-latitude STE event over the elevated tropical basin of Mexico City, including the combined analysis of Rossby wave breaking, isentropic transport pathways, PV evolution, tropopause fold structure, and trajectory-based descent into the lower troposphere. We particularly highlight the role of persistent isentropic transport and the interaction between subtropical jet dynamics and complex topography in enabling deep descent over a tropical megacity, a phenomenon with significant implications for one of the world's most populated cities.We agree that quantitative attribution between direct stratospheric influence and in situ photochemical ozone production would be a valuable extension of this work. However, our study was intentionally designed as a dynamical case study using reanalysis diagnostics, Lagrangian trajectories, and isentropic transport methods, rather than as a chemistry-transport modelling or source-apportionment study. Conducting chemistry-on/off sensitivity simulations or dedicated chemical transport model experiments would require a substantial expansion beyond our current methodological scope.We would like to clarify that the manuscript does not attribute the observed surface ozone exceedances solely to STE. Throughout, we present STE as a dynamical preconditioning mechanism that increased background ozone levels before the pollution episode, while local photochemical production likely amplified the subsequent exceedance. This distinction is explicitly addressed in the Discussion and Conclusions, where we state that the exceedances cannot be attributed solely to STE and that local photochemical ozone production likely played a substantial role.We appreciate the co-editor’s suggestion and agree that atmospheric chemistry simulations would provide valuable constraints on the relative contributions of stratospheric and photochemical ozone. We will carefully consider this point alongside forthcoming reviewer comments and will revise the manuscript accordingly to further clarify the scope and novelty of the study, as well as the limitations of the current dynamical framework, and the role of future chemistry-transport analyses.Citation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/egusphere-2025-5743-AC3
-
AC3: 'Reply on EC1', Clemente Lopez-Bravo, 27 May 2026
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,913 | 1,107 | 181 | 3,201 | 604 | 123 | 119 |
- HTML: 1,913
- PDF: 1,107
- XML: 181
- Total: 3,201
- Supplement: 604
- BibTeX: 123
- EndNote: 119
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1