Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5708
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5708
16 Dec 2025
 | 16 Dec 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Annual cycle of surface-coupling effects on Arctic mixed-phase clouds during MOSAiC

Hannes Jascha Griesche, Ronny Engelmann, Martin Radenz, Julian Hofer, Dietrich Althausen, Albert Ansmann, Kevin Barry, Jessie Creamean, Cristofer Jimenez, and Patric Seifert

Abstract. Persistent mixed-phase clouds frequently occurred in the Arctic and have significant impacts on the Arctic climate. The surface mixed-layer (SML) coupling status of these clouds impacts their microphysical properties. During an Arctic summer cruise in 2017, surface-coupled clouds were observed to contain ice more often than decoupled clouds at low-supercooling temperatures. Here, an annual cycle of Arctic mixed-phase cloud ice-formation temperatures is presented for the Arctic ice-drift experiment Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) in 2019 and 2020. From October until March no clouds with cloud minimum temperatures above −10 °C were observed. From April to September an increased fraction of ice-containing clouds was observed for clouds with minimum temperatures between −7.5 °C and −5 °C (between 40% and 70%). Between April and July SML-coupled clouds with a minimum temperature above −7.5 °C showed an enhanced fraction of ice-containing clouds, compared to decoupled clouds (2–3 times higher). Also, SML-coupled clouds were 2–4 times more likely to be observed during this period. In August + September the ratio of coupled-to-decoupled ice-containing clouds reduced to 1.3, due to a higher frequency of occurrence of ice-containing decoupled clouds. Using surface-based ice-nucleating particle (INP) measurements the observed phenomena could likely be attributed to the presence of INPs active above −15 °C at the surface. Analysis of sea-ice concentration in the surrounding region, the distance to the ice edge, and the travel time along the back-trajectories to the marginal ice zone supports this finding.

Competing interests: Jessie Creamean is a member of the editorial board of ACP.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Hannes Jascha Griesche, Ronny Engelmann, Martin Radenz, Julian Hofer, Dietrich Althausen, Albert Ansmann, Kevin Barry, Jessie Creamean, Cristofer Jimenez, and Patric Seifert

Status: open (until 27 Jan 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Hannes Jascha Griesche, Ronny Engelmann, Martin Radenz, Julian Hofer, Dietrich Althausen, Albert Ansmann, Kevin Barry, Jessie Creamean, Cristofer Jimenez, and Patric Seifert
Hannes Jascha Griesche, Ronny Engelmann, Martin Radenz, Julian Hofer, Dietrich Althausen, Albert Ansmann, Kevin Barry, Jessie Creamean, Cristofer Jimenez, and Patric Seifert
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 16 Dec 2025
Download
Short summary
A full annual cycle of mixed-phase ice-formation temperatures in the high Arctic is presented. Ship-based remote sensing with lidar and cloud radar from the Arctic expedition MOSAiC was used to investigate the impact of surface processes on mixed-phase cloud properties. Surface mixed-layer cloud coupling was derived base on radiosonde profiles. Combined with INP filter samples, sea ice concentration and back-trajectory analysis an influence of surface processes on the cloud properties was found.
Share