Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5631
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5631
01 Dec 2025
 | 01 Dec 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Effects of Model Grid Spacing for Warm Conveyor Belt (WCB) Moisture Transport into the Upper Troposphere and Lower Stratosphere (UTLS) – Part II: Eulerian Perspective

Cornelis Schwenk and Annette Miltenberger

Abstract. Warm conveyor belts (WCBs) are important features of extratropical cyclones that transport water vapor and hydrometeors into the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UTLS), influencing Earth's radiative budget. Previous studies have demonstrated that the horizontal grid spacing of numerical weather prediction (NWP) models influences modeled WCB properties such as ascent rates and diabatic heating. This two-part study investigates how model grid spacing affects the transport of moisture. We analyze two ICON model simulations of one North Atlantic WCB case study: a convection-parameterizing run at ~ 13 km and a convection-permitting run at ~ 3.5 km approximate grid spacing. Here, present the Eulerian perspective to complement the Lagrangian perspective from the first part of this study. We determine that the convection-parameterizing simulation produces a more humid UTLS in the WCB outflow. This results from (i) larger and fewer ice crystals, slowing the depletion of supersaturation, and (ii) the convection parameterization scheme, which injects excess vapor into the UTLS, when compared to the convection permitting simulation. The convection-permitting simulation experiences larger vertical velocities, which allows for the formation of thicker clouds with more graupel. Cloud-top temperatures are similar, yet the convection permitting simulation produces more outgoing long-wave radiation, which we can attribute to differences in UTLS vapor. Our findings indicate that convection-parameterizing simulations likely misrepresent moisture and hydrometeor transport by WCBs. This has implications for how global climate models simulate the radiative impact of WCBs and their potential influence on upper-level flow.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Cornelis Schwenk and Annette Miltenberger

Status: open (until 12 Jan 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Cornelis Schwenk and Annette Miltenberger
Cornelis Schwenk and Annette Miltenberger
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 01 Dec 2025
Download
Short summary
We examined how model resolution affects the moisture and cloud content of large weather systems that move warm, moist air into the upper troposphere. By comparing high- and low-resolution simulations, we found that models which can resolve convectively ascending air produce drier air and more outgoing longwave radiation. This shows that model grid-spacing impacts modeled upper-level moisture and Earth's radiative balance.
Share