Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5629
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5629
01 Dec 2025
 | 01 Dec 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Effects of Model Grid Spacing for Warm Conveyor Belt (WCB) Moisture Transport into the Upper Troposphere and Lower Stratosphere (UTLS) – Part I: Lagrangian Perspective

Cornelis Schwenk and Annette Miltenberger

Abstract. Warm conveyor belts (WCBs) in extratropical cyclones transport moisture and hydrometeors into the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UTLS), influencing the radiative balance. Earlier research has shown that the horizontal grid spacing of numerical weather prediction (NWP) models has an impact on the modelled WCB properties, such as ascent rates and diabatic heating. This first part of a two-part study examines the impact of model grid spacing on the transport of moisture from a Lagrangian perspective. We analyze two ICON model simulations of one North Atlantic WCB case study: a convection-parameterizing run at ~ 13 km and a convection-permitting run at ~ 3.5 km approximate grid spacing. We hypothesize that key differences in the modelled transport of moisture arise from higher vertical velocities in the high-resolution simulation. The convection-permitting simulation produces more rapid ascent and a drier WCB outflow with lower specific and relative humidity. We attribute this to higher ice number concentrations, which deplete supersaturation more efficiently. This high-resolution simulation also exhibits more pronounced frozen-phase microphysics, stronger frozen precipitation, notably different hydrometeor mass mixing ratios, number concentrations, and radii than the lower resolution simulation – indicating that horizontal resolution substantially influences modelled WCB cloud composition. These results demonstrate that weather and climate models using convection-parameterizing resolutions may systematically misrepresent WCB cloud properties and UTLS humidity, with potential consequences for accurately simulating Earth's radiative budget and upper-level flow.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Cornelis Schwenk and Annette Miltenberger

Status: open (until 12 Jan 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Cornelis Schwenk and Annette Miltenberger
Cornelis Schwenk and Annette Miltenberger
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 01 Dec 2025
Download
Short summary
We studied how model grid-spacing affects how moisture and ice are carried upward in large weather systems that move warm, moist air into the upper troposphere. By comparing high- and low-resolution simulations, we found that models which are able to represent convectively ascending air produce much drier air at high altitudes. This shows that model resolution strongly influences how water and clouds are transported and how they may affect climate.
Share