the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Evaluating Long-Term Effectiveness of Managed Aquifer Recharge for Groundwater Recovery and Nitrate Mitigation in an Overexploited Aquifer System
Abstract. Managed aquifer recharge (MAR) has been widely recognized as an effective strategy for groundwater restoration and has been implemented globally. In the North China Plain, over-extraction of groundwater has led to a continuous decline in water levels, forming one of the world's most significant groundwater depressions. Recent riverine MAR operations have shown significant local groundwater recovery, yet the regional-scale hydrological and geochemical impacts of sustained MAR remain insufficiently understood. Most existing studies rely on short-term field monitoring and emphasize localized responses. This study, focusing on Xiong’an depression area, develops a coupled flow and multi-component reactive transport model to evaluate the long-term impacts of MAR on groundwater recovery and the spatiotemporal evolution of water quality. The results indicate that MAR substantially accelerates groundwater recovery and mitigates the regional depression, though the central funnel exhibits a delayed response due to its distance from recharge sources. Nitrate reduction is dominated by dilution effects from recharge water rather than denitrification, with heterogeneity exerting strong control on the spatial pattern but limited influence on overall concentration levels. These findings highlight the dual hydrological and geochemical benefits of sustained MAR and provide quantitative insights for optimizing large-scale recharge strategies in overexploited aquifer systems.
- Preprint
(2790 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(185 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 31 Dec 2025)
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-5534', Anonymous Referee #1, 22 Nov 2025 reply
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 59 | 15 | 5 | 79 | 7 | 2 | 2 |
- HTML: 59
- PDF: 15
- XML: 5
- Total: 79
- Supplement: 7
- BibTeX: 2
- EndNote: 2
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Yuguang Zhu
Zhilin Guo
Sichen Wan
Kewei Chen
Yushan Wang
Zhenzhong Zeng
Huizhong Shen
Jianhuai Ye
Chunmiao Zheng
Groundwater is rapidly being depleted in many regions, threatening water security and food production. We studied a major groundwater depression in northern China to test whether recharging aquifers with diverted river water can help recovery. Using long-term computer simulations, we found that recharge raises water levels and dilutes nitrate pollution, offering an effective way to restore overused aquifers.
Groundwater is rapidly being depleted in many regions, threatening water security and food...
My comments are as follows:
1. The paper is interesting and well written, and it is relevant to the water management of a vital area of China: Xiongan New District.
2. There are two major issues that require a much more careful analysis, and I hope the authors can revise their paper accordingly. The first is the description of denitrification. In this manuscript, the authors used a two-step reduction to simplify the process. This is OK, but requires a much more careful and detailed analysis to justify its correctness. It is well known that denitrification is a complex process controlled by many factors. So, the authors should carefully justify why such a two-step reduction treatment is acceptable for this site!
3. The second issue is related to Eq. 5. The author stated that “ For example, according to the redox gradient theory, sulfate reduction may be inhibited by oxygen, nitrate, and trivalent iron dissolved in groundwater. These effects are modeled using an inhibition term in equation (5)”. This is not sufficient. I would like the authors to explain what “inhibition term in Eq. (5)” is used and why. In one sentence: more elaboration is needed here!
4. L60, there should be a question mark “?” after the two questions mentioned there.
5. L65, when NCP is mentioned for the first time, the full name of NCP must be provided.
I will recommend moderate revision.