Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5524
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5524
20 Nov 2025
 | 20 Nov 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Long-range impacts of biomass burning on PM2.5: a case study of the UK with a globally nested model

Damaris Y. T. Tan, Mathew R. Heal, David S. Stevenson, Stefan Reis, Massimo Vieno, and Eiko Nemitz

Abstract. Open biomass burning impacts air quality through direct emissions of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and its role in secondary PM2.5 formation. Here the interest is in the long distance and cumulative influences of biomass burning on annual mean concentrations of PM2.5 in a country far removed from major biomass burning regions: the UK. A novel, globally nested setup of the EMEP4UK atmospheric chemistry transport model is used to isolate contributions to UK PM2.5 from global biomass burning activity. Long-range influences are found to be considerable, with 0.99 μg m-3 of UK-averaged PM2.5 in 2019 being conditional on biomass burning emissions. Of this, 97 % and 73 % are associated with biomass burning outside the UK and outside the model's European domain, respectively – notably from Russia, Asia and boreal North America – which highlights the importance of boundary conditions on regional modelling setups. The simulations suggest some influences of biomass burning have lags of several weeks. The long-range component is enhanced by the role of biomass burning in secondary aerosol formation (58 % of PM2.5 conditional on biomass burning), of which 55 % is organic; the inorganic component (mainly NH4NO3) derives from increased oxidation of local emissions, which may be mitigated through local emissions reductions. The PM2.5 conditional on biomass burning is highly policy relevant for the UK, constituting (for 2019) 20 % of the current WHO target and 10 % of the contribution from all sources. This relative contribution is likely to increase as anthropogenic PM2.5 declines and as climate change increases northern-hemispheric extratropical biomass burning.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Damaris Y. T. Tan, Mathew R. Heal, David S. Stevenson, Stefan Reis, Massimo Vieno, and Eiko Nemitz

Status: open (until 01 Jan 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Damaris Y. T. Tan, Mathew R. Heal, David S. Stevenson, Stefan Reis, Massimo Vieno, and Eiko Nemitz
Damaris Y. T. Tan, Mathew R. Heal, David S. Stevenson, Stefan Reis, Massimo Vieno, and Eiko Nemitz
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 20 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
Our focus is the cumulative influence of biomass burning (BB) on PM2.5 concentrations in a country far-removed from major BB sources. We find that ~10 % of UK annual mean PM2.5 is conditional on BB emissions, 97 % and 73 % from BB outside the UK and outside Europe. The majority of the long-range component is secondary, of which much of the inorganic is mediated through local anthropogenic emissions. The relative contribution of BB in such locations is an increasing challenge for PM2.5 targets.
Share