Glass plate sampling efficiency for trace gases in the sea surface microlayer
Abstract. Many climate-active trace gases in the atmosphere are closely linked to production and consumption in the ocean, which are, in turn, influenced by the sea surface microlayer (SML). The SML is the upper most layer of the ocean with up to 1 mm thickness, often enriched in organics. Studies of trace gases in the SML aim to identify and quantify potential processes unique to the SML and to understand the SML's influence on the transfer between air and sea. Established sampling techniques of the SML (e.g., glass plate, mesh screen) are associated with high losses for the volatile trace gases. Despite the high losses, in this study we find that meaningful analysis of glass plate samples for trace gases is possible. We experimentally determined the sampling efficiency for the short-lived trace gases dimethyl sulphide (DMS), isoprene, and carbon disulphide (CS2). Water temperature and trace gas concentration were the main drivers for sampling efficiency variability, while salinity and the number of dips of the glass plate were not significant. The effect of surfactants could not finally be untangled. Although our results are consistent, we do not quantify a sampling efficiency to correct individual measurements, as our experiments did not encompass the full suite of environmental parameters normally encountered in the field. Instead, we suggest to use 0.13 ± 0.01 (± standard error) for DMS and isoprene, and 0.12 ± 0.01 for CS2 as thresholds to identify cases of net production in the SML. Future studies should extend to long-lived species (e.g., nitrous oxide, methane), include the effect of wind, and be repeated for the mesh screen. We hypothesize that a correction of individual measurements requires to determine sampling efficiency as a function of environmental parameters, for which the underlying physicochemical relationships need to be unraveled by increasing the parameter space studied here.
Competing interests: Hermann W. Bange is a member of the editorial board of Biogeosciences.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.