Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5360
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5360
01 Dec 2025
 | 01 Dec 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).

The Impact of Large-Scale Macroalgae Cultivation and Harvesting Strategies on the Marine Carbon Dioxide Removal Efficacy and Marine Biogeochemistry

Prima Anugerahanti, Julien Palmieri, Chelsey A. Baker, Ekaterina Popova, and Andrew Yool

Abstract. The large-scale cultivation of macroalgae has been proposed as a marine carbon dioxide removal (mCDR) strategy, yet its efficiency and consequences for ocean biogeochemistry remain uncertain. Using a new macroalgae aquaculture module within an ocean biogeochemistry model, NEMO-MEDUSA, we investigate carbon removal potential and biogeochemical feedbacks under hypothetical global-scale macroalgae cultivation with varying harvest strategies, loss rates, and iron availability. Overall cultivation enhances air–sea CO2 uptake by 11.0 Pg C yr-1, but only ∼ 27 % of macroalgal production results in additional CO2 uptake. Furthermore, natural phytoplankton and zooplankton biomass is suppressed by almost 50 % and is geographically displaced by significant surface nutrient changes. Sinking of the harvested biomass to the deep ocean drives widespread oxygen depletion (-20 % globally), creating new suboxic zones in deposition regions. When macroalgal growth is not supplemented with iron micronutrient, its production declines sharply (-74 %), revealing a significant limitation for large-scale feasibility. Collectively, our results reveal that large-scale macroalgal cultivation offers low mCDR potential, that it is both spatially extensive and locally intensive, and its unintended biogeochemical consequences can be substantial. Our findings highlight the urgent need to assess nutrient constraints and ecological trade-offs before considering this method as a viable large-scale mCDR strategy. 

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Prima Anugerahanti, Julien Palmieri, Chelsey A. Baker, Ekaterina Popova, and Andrew Yool

Status: open (until 12 Jan 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Prima Anugerahanti, Julien Palmieri, Chelsey A. Baker, Ekaterina Popova, and Andrew Yool
Prima Anugerahanti, Julien Palmieri, Chelsey A. Baker, Ekaterina Popova, and Andrew Yool
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 01 Dec 2025
Download
Short summary
We used an ocean biogeochemistry model to investigate carbon removal potential of large-scale seaweed cultivation with multiple operational strategies and how it impacts the natural ocean biogeochemistry. Our results show that cultivation can increase atmospheric CO2 uptake, but at the expense of decreasing nutrients, phytoplankton production, and deoxygenation. These trade-offs need to be assessed before considering large-scale seaweed cultivation for CDR.
Share