the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Interpretation and Representation in Geomodels: The POKIMON Ontology for Formalizing Geomodelling Knowledge
Abstract. With their growing volumes and uses, it is increasingly important to understand the interpretative and representational aspects of three-dimensional (3D) geosciences models. Such understanding will not only clarify key premises, inferences, and conclusions, but also enable more informed applications. Yet the epistemic foundations are often opaque. Critical information about assumptions, reasoning steps, and uncertainties typically remains tacit in the mind of the geomodeller. This lack of transparency hampers explainability, reproducibility, and broader utility. Current practices therefore 15 limit trust, knowledge transfer, and automation in geomodelling workflows. To address these limitations, we develop the POKIMON ontology, designed to make explicit the expert knowledge, interpretative choices, and conceptual structures underlying 3D geosciences models. POKIMON provides a formalized framework to represent how geological and geomdelling concepts are applied during model construction. Motivating use-cases, the ontological structure, and its application to the use[1]cases are presented to demonstrate utility and to advance automated knowledge-driven 3D geomodelling.
- Preprint
(3336 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 13 Feb 2026)
-
CEC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-5332', Juan Antonio Añel, 26 Dec 2025
reply
-
CC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Boyan Brodaric, 09 Jan 2026
reply
Thanks for the comment. The scripts to generate the diagrams are not an integral part of the paper and are not at all part of its innovation or results. The are analogous to using Adobe Illustrator to make a diagram. We believe that in the same way that it would not be expected that an article supply Illustrator for reviewers or readers to recreate the diagram, it should not be necessary to supply the scripts to recrate the diagrams; they merely used to illustrate the results but are not the results themselves. We propose to remove the sentence about the scripts from the paper to avoid confusion. Otherwise, we took care to ensure the paper meets all code availability criteria, as all other materials relevant to the results are made available with their location indicated in the paper.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5332-CC1 -
CC2: 'Reply on CEC1', Boyan Brodaric, 09 Jan 2026
reply
To conclude my prior comment: after the sentence about scripts is removed can we resubmit a new copy without resubmitting a revision? What is the process? Thanks.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5332-CC2 -
CEC2: 'Reply on CC2', Juan Antonio Añel, 09 Jan 2026
reply
Dear authors,
Thanks for your reply. You must wait until the end of the Discussions stage to address this issue in the manuscript. Then, if the Topical Editor considers that it is acceptable for publication or additional review stages, you will be able of submitting a new version of the manuscript addressing this issue.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5332-CEC2
-
CEC2: 'Reply on CC2', Juan Antonio Añel, 09 Jan 2026
reply
-
CC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Boyan Brodaric, 09 Jan 2026
reply
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 112 | 40 | 12 | 164 | 24 | 24 |
- HTML: 112
- PDF: 40
- XML: 12
- Total: 164
- BibTeX: 24
- EndNote: 24
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Dear authors,
Regards,
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor