the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Reconstruction of winter temperature of southwest China over the past 300 years based on a Bayesian approach
Abstract. A Bayesian approach was applied to reconstruct winter temperatures in southwestern China from 1700 to 1949, using 1950–1999 as the reference period. Within this methodological framework, documentary data provided weather and climate information to generate the Cold Weather Index (CWI; 1 = warm, 6 = extremely cold), two paleoclimate simulation ensembles served as priors, and uncertainties in the documentary records together with the dependence of observations on climate contributed to the likelihood estimates. The reconstructed CWI identified 20 extremely cold, 34 cold, and 15 warm winters, with the 1890s emerging as the coldest decade of the past three centuries due to a succession of severe winters. The posterior reveals pronounced interannual variability with an amplitude of ~ 2.77 °C, slightly smaller than existing reconstructions from an individual station, where the coldest winter was ~ 2 °C colder than the reference period. On longer timescales, the reconstruction captures a cold phase in the latter part of the nineteenth century and the warming in the twentieth century. An alternative reconstruction using time-independent priors demonstrate the capacity of the approach to disentangle the contributions of simulations and documentary evidence. This study provides a new regional climate reconstruction for southwestern China and highlights the potential of Bayesian approach for obtaining climate reconstructions from documentary climate data.
- Preprint
(2190 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1113 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 24 Apr 2026)
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-5326', Anonymous Referee #1, 29 Dec 2025 reply
-
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-5326', Yang Liu, 17 Feb 2026
reply
This manuscript presents a new winter temperature reconstruction for southwestern China and introduces a probabilistic perspective that assimilates uncertainties inherent in historical documentary records. The resulting reconstructions appear solid and the approach holds potential for further application. However, the presentation could be improved, as some methods and results are difficult to follow without an overall understanding of the Bayesian approach. I recommend publication after revision, with specific comments provided below.
Line 22: The characteristics of “data-sparse” and “complex climate” appear to be influenced by multiple factors, including both natural and social-economic conditions. Clarifying these two aspects separately may improve the readability.
Line 143-144: The description of the procedure for extracting the snowfall boundary is not sufficiently clear. It would be helpful to describe the extraction process in more detail with explicit reference to the dataset actually used which is mentioned in subsection 2.4 and to clarify how the boundary longitudes and latitudes are derived based on it.
Line 146: The phrase “multiple climate zones” is repeated in this sentence. Please remove instance would improve the readability.
Figure 1(a): The legend label “Chongqing” is misspelled.
Line 195-205: Without a general introduction to the Bayesian framework, it is difficult for readers to understand what the prior and likelihood specifically represent, and to maintain this understanding when reading the subsequent results, especially for readers who are less familiar with the Bayesian approach. I recommend adding a brief introductory paragraph under the title of sub-section 3.3, outlining the basic principles of Bayesian theory and explaining how it is applied in this study to climate reconstruction based on documentary records. In addition, this paragraph introduces several reconstructions, including the CWI-ModE-Sim, CWI-LME, and CWI-ModE-Clim. It is difficult to understand what are the acronyms refer and how are they linked to the first reconstructed index (CWI). I recommend including a clear flowchart illustrating the input datasets, reconstruction procedure, and derived products, which would greatly improve the clarity and readability of the methods section.
Lines 235–237: The meaning of “cumulative observed frequency” is not entirely clear. In addition, Figure 2a is somewhat confusing, especially with respect to the rapid decrease in the observed frequency of “snow” during the first few decades. Further clarification and explanation would improve readability.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5326-CC1
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 338 | 363 | 34 | 735 | 61 | 29 | 23 |
- HTML: 338
- PDF: 363
- XML: 34
- Total: 735
- Supplement: 61
- BibTeX: 29
- EndNote: 23
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
(please see PDF comments)