Beyond wind-induced upwelling: diverse drivers of future productivity in eastern boundary upwelling systems
Abstract. Eastern Boundary Upwelling Systems (EBUS) contribute disproportionately to global marine productivity and fisheries, yet their response to climate change remains poorly understood. Given the essential ecosystem services they support, improving projections of future EBUS dynamics is critical. Here we analyze projections of Net Primary Production (NPP) and its driving mechanisms using Earth System Models (ESMs) from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6). Across the four major EBUS, twenty-first century NPP projections exhibit larger model uncertainty than scenario uncertainty, with limited confidence in the direction of future trends under different scenarios. This uncertainty partially results from compensating positive and negative NPP anomalies within individual systems, with consistent multi-model responses only emerging at subsystem scales. Although, consistent with most past studies, changes in upwelling-favorable winds are an important driver of the EBUS NPP response to climate change, they cannot fully explain projected responses. In the equatorward sectors of the Canary and Benguela systems, as well as in the historically most productive area of the California system (regions encapsulating 25 % of total EBUS area) a weakening of alongshore wind stress reduces upwelling intensity, nutrient supply to the euphotic zone and consequently NPP. However, in the remaining 75 % of EBUS extent, additional mechanisms are required to explain projected changes. These include upwelling anomalies induced by geostrophic transport and wind-stress curl, enhanced stratification, and changes in subsurface nutrient reservoirs, highlighting the complex and locally-specific response of EBUS productivity to climate change.
This is an interesting study in which the authors use a suite of ESMs to evaluate future changes in NPP and their associated drivers in the EBUSs. The study highlights that the traditionally assumed key mechanism, upwelling-favorable winds, can only explain about 25% of NPP changes in the EBUS, while the remaining three-quarters are influenced by diverse drivers.
However, I do not recommend this manuscript for publication at this stage, as major revision is required. In my view, the current analysis of the relationship between upwelling-favorable winds and future NPP changes is somewhat simplistic and would benefit from a deeper investigation of model biases, inter-model differences, and regional variability. In addition, the discussion of the “diverse drivers” is uneven: analyses of physical processes such as geostrophic transport and wind-stress curl are extremely limited, whereas stratification and biogeochemical control of subsurface nutrient reservoirs are discussed in much greater detail. I therefore suggest that the authors thoroughly reconsider and improve the structure and balance of the manuscript.
Please find my detailed comments in the attached file.