Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5214
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5214
04 Nov 2025
 | 04 Nov 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).

Measurement of turbulence energy dissipation rate by a standalone high-resolution Doppler lidar

Abdul Haseeb Syed, Jakob Mann, and Mohammadreza Manami

Abstract. A second-order structure function model for the lidar line of sight (LOS) velocities is proposed. This structure function model corrects for the turbulence filtering due to the probe volume averaging effect using a Gaussian weighting function. It takes advantage of the high range gate resolution of the BEAM 6x pulsed lidar used in this study, i.e., 3 m, to effectively resolve the inertial subrange. The structure function model is then used to obtain the turbulence energy dissipation rate (ε) by fitting the model over lidar measurements in the inertial subrange. Unlike previously presented structure function methods to evaluate ε in the literature, this method has a weaker dependence on the turbulence length scale. The estimated ε values obtained from the lidar are compared with the values obtained from ultrasonic anemometers at three heights: 103 m, 175 m, and 241 m. The comparison results show excellent correlation between the two sets, with a Pearson correlation coefficient (ρ) value of more than 0.9 at all three heights. The observed bias was also found to be very small, i.e., more than 50 % of all the lidar-measured ε values were found within ±20 % of the sonic-measured values. This method relies on the proper detection of the inertial subrange; hence, during very stable atmospheric conditions, the model fitting on the measurements produced relatively larger errors, due to the difficulty in detecting the inertial subrange. Applications of this method include, but are not limited to, quantifying turbulence in the wake of aircraft, understanding pollutant dispersion in urban environments, and wind resource and turbulence assessment in areas where erecting a meteorological mast is not possible.

Competing interests: MM is employed by Lumibird SA, the manufacturer of the lidar used in this study.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Abdul Haseeb Syed, Jakob Mann, and Mohammadreza Manami

Status: open (until 31 Dec 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Abdul Haseeb Syed, Jakob Mann, and Mohammadreza Manami
Abdul Haseeb Syed, Jakob Mann, and Mohammadreza Manami

Viewed

Total article views: 149 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
110 27 12 149 11 10
  • HTML: 110
  • PDF: 27
  • XML: 12
  • Total: 149
  • BibTeX: 11
  • EndNote: 10
Views and downloads (calculated since 04 Nov 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 04 Nov 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 147 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 147 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 26 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
We present a new structure function model to estimate the turbulence energy dissipation rate using lidar velocities. The model corrects for turbulence filtering due to the lidar probe volume by applying a Gaussian weighting function. By utilizing the high 3 m range-gate resolution of the BEAM 6x pulsed lidar, we achieve excellent agreement between turbulence energy dissipation rate values derived from lidar and sonic anemometer at three heights, with correlation coefficients exceeding 0.9.
Share