the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Dynamics and roles in art and climate science collaborations: experiences from the University of Hamburg
Abstract. Art and science collaborations enable new means for science communication, knowledge production, and activism. Previous work has often focused on the outcome of such endeavors and on an external description of these collaborations, and less on the personal dynamics in the collaboration itself. Our study of art and science collaborations in the project "Portraits of Climate" at the University of Hamburg takes a closer look at internal dynamics and roles and shows that the value or success of a collaboration does not depend on whether it is a one-way or a two-way collaboration, or whether the roles are classically separated in artist and scientist or are mixed. Instead, the decisive factors lie in mutual understanding, acceptance of team dynamics, and the subjective perceptions of participants – shaped by their motivations, backgrounds, and relationships with the partners – which often differs from an objective external description of the process observed. The project highlighted the importance of safe spaces, trust, and openness, while also revealing the fragility of these conditions without active facilitation and support. Although constrained to a small group of participants and visitors, the project demonstrated the potential of art and science collaborations to stimulate intellectual growth, to overcome one's predefined role, and to open a gateway for critical reflection, thereby catalyzing new approaches to addressing the environmental challenges of our time.
- Preprint
(712 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 29 Jan 2026)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-5213', Todd Siler, 09 Dec 2025
reply
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2025/egusphere-2025-5213/egusphere-2025-5213-RC1-supplement.pdfReplyCitation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/egusphere-2025-5213-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Anna Pagnone, 22 Dec 2025
reply
We would like to sincerely thank Todd Siler for your constructive and encouraging comments, and especially for highlighting the importance of ArtScience collaborations in climate and environmental research.
We greatly appreciate the extensive list of references provided; we will carefully consider and incorporate a selection of these into our manuscript.
Your added factors contributing to a “successful collaboration” have been particularly enlightening. We recognize the need for clearer definitions, especially given the diversity of „related yet distinct, terms—Art & Science, art-science, Art/Science, Science/Art, SciArt, and ArtScience". However, we remain cautious about over-formalizing something that is inherently fluid and deep.
Your comments have also inspired us to reflect on how to better support and structure such collaborations.
As a side note, we would like to emphasize that, in some of our case studies, the expectations associated with experience in art and science collaborations sometimes hindered the collaborative process. Conversely, some newcomers, without expectations, approached the collaboration with fresh perspectives, leading to stronger bounds.
Once again, we are deeply grateful for your thoughtful support and comments, which will significantly enriched our work.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5213-AC1
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Anna Pagnone, 22 Dec 2025
reply
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 172 | 117 | 26 | 315 | 19 | 17 |
- HTML: 172
- PDF: 117
- XML: 26
- Total: 315
- BibTeX: 19
- EndNote: 17
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1