Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5206
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5206
24 Oct 2025
 | 24 Oct 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Emerging low-cloud feedback and adjustment in global satellite observations

Paulo Ceppi, Sarah Wilson Kemsley, Hendrik Andersen, Timothy Andrews, Ryan J. Kramer, Peer Nowack, Casey J. Wall, and Mark D. Zelinka

Abstract. From mid-2003 to mid-2024, a decrease in low-cloud amount enhanced the absorption of solar radiation by 0.22±0.07 W m-2 decade-1 (±1σ range), accelerating the energy imbalance trend during that period (0.44 W m-2 decade-1). Through controlling factor analysis, here we show that the low-cloud trend is due to a combination of cloud feedback and adjustments to aerosols and greenhouse gases (respectively 0.07±0.01, 0.06±0.01, and 0.05±0.03 W m-2 decade-1), which jointly account for 82 % of the trend. The contribution of natural climate variability is weak but uncertain (0.03±0.07 W m-2 decade-1), owing to a poorly constrained trend in boundary-layer inversion strength. Importantly, the observed low-cloud radiative trend lies well within the range of values simulated by contemporary global climate models under conditions close to present day. Any systematic model error in the representation of present-day global energy imbalance trends is thus likely to originate in processes other than low clouds.

Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Paulo Ceppi, Sarah Wilson Kemsley, Hendrik Andersen, Timothy Andrews, Ryan J. Kramer, Peer Nowack, Casey J. Wall, and Mark D. Zelinka

Status: open (until 23 Nov 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Paulo Ceppi, Sarah Wilson Kemsley, Hendrik Andersen, Timothy Andrews, Ryan J. Kramer, Peer Nowack, Casey J. Wall, and Mark D. Zelinka
Paulo Ceppi, Sarah Wilson Kemsley, Hendrik Andersen, Timothy Andrews, Ryan J. Kramer, Peer Nowack, Casey J. Wall, and Mark D. Zelinka
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 24 Oct 2025
Download
Short summary
Recent decades have seen a marked decrease in global low-level cloud cover, leading to more sunlight heating the Earth. This trend is poorly understood, raising the concern that clouds may amplify global warming more than previously thought. We show that the cloud decrease is mostly caused by human forcing on climate, and that it agrees with previous estimates of how clouds respond to decreasing aerosol pollution, increasing greenhouse gas concentration, and their effects on global temperature.
Share