Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5136
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5136
24 Oct 2025
 | 24 Oct 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Climate of the Past (CP).

A model intercomparison of radiocarbon-based marine reservoir ages during the last 55 kyr including abrupt changes in the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation

Peter Köhler, Laurie Menviel, Frerk Pöppelmeier, Tim J. Heaton, Edouard Bard, and Luke C. Skinner

Abstract. Changes in the marine reservoir age (MRA) of the surface ocean are important information used for radiocarbon dating of marine sediment cores or archaeological artifacts. MRA changes are expressed relative to the atmosphere, and as such are dependent on the prevailing atmospheric radiocarbon calibration curve. The most recent estimate for evolving global average MRA for latitudes approximately < 50° is incorporated into the marine calibration curve Marine20, which was directly calculated from the atmospheric ∆14C record, IntCal20, using the carbon cycle box model BICYCLE, taking into account observed changes in the carbon cycle. These simulations did not consider changes in the strength of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) related to Dansgaard/Oeschger and Heinrich events. A recent study using the successor BICYCLE-SE suggested that abrupt AMOC changes would lead to changes in MRA of less than 100 14C yr in the non-polar surface ocean (about < 50°). To better support previous model-based MRA and to further constrain the impact of AMOC changes on MRA, we here assess transient simulations of the last 55 kyr performed by two Earth System Models of Intermediate Complexity (EMICs), LOVECLIM and Bern3D, and compare them to the published BICYCLE-SE box model results and previous output from the LSG ocean general circulation model. The setups within this MRA model intercomparison (MRA-MIP) are not identical, but all models are forced by atmospheric CO2 and ∆14C to have the surface ocean carbon cycle state as close as possible to reconstructions. Simulations with abrupt AMOC reductions during stadials display a rise in in MRA in the surface northern Atlantic (>50° N) and the deep Atlantic, for example during Heinrich stadial 1 of 300–1250 and 500–1300 14C yr, respectively, roughly in agreement with their reconstructed rises by about 1200–1300 14C yr. We find that the changes in the mean non-polar surface MRA (< 50° latitude) during abrupt AMOC changes in LOVECLIM are also in the order of ±100 14C yr, while in Bern3D simulating changes are up to ±200 14C yr. While the models tend to agree that a reduced AMOC leads to lower MRA in the low-latitude surface ocean, under some conditions the opposite is found (e.g. simulations with LOVECLIM across Heinrich stadial 1). Spatially resolved results of the models show that changes in surface MRA during stadials depict the general pattern of a radiocarbon bipolar seesaw (older surface water in the high north, younger in the high south and in the Indo-Pacific), in agreement with previously published reconstructions, but with model-specific details in the non-polar Atlantic. Throughout the last 50 kyr, the change in the multi-model mean in non-polar MRA of the 2 EMICs when compared with Marine20 is less than 100 14C years and within the uncertainties of Marine20. Furthermore, changes in the MRA of the high latitude Southern Ocean (> 50° S) are extremely model-dependent and for most times between 18 and 43 kyr BP the changes in the multi-model mean MRA are larger than the 95 % confidence interval of the non-polar MRA depicted in Marine20, making the construction of a similarly numerical model-based calibration curve for this region a challenging task.

Competing interests: LM is co-editor-in-chief of Climate of the Past.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Peter Köhler, Laurie Menviel, Frerk Pöppelmeier, Tim J. Heaton, Edouard Bard, and Luke C. Skinner

Status: open (until 19 Dec 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Peter Köhler, Laurie Menviel, Frerk Pöppelmeier, Tim J. Heaton, Edouard Bard, and Luke C. Skinner

Data sets

Model output from LOVECLIM and Bern3D Peter Köhler, Laurie Menviel, Frerk Pöppelmeier, Timothy J. Heaton, Edouard Bard, and Luke C. Skinner https://my.hidrive.com/lnk/EhfGOFikK

Peter Köhler, Laurie Menviel, Frerk Pöppelmeier, Tim J. Heaton, Edouard Bard, and Luke C. Skinner
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 24 Oct 2025
Download
Short summary
Radiocarbon (14C) is decaying over time, which is used to determine the age of carbon-containing objects. Calibration curves are necessary to come from measured 14C values to calendar ages. We use different models in order to improve future calibration curves, especially around times of abrupt changes in the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation. We find that uncertainties during those times are underrepresented in present calibrations, especially in the Atlantic.
Share