the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Curlew 1.0: Spatio-temporal implicit geological modelling with neural fields in python
Abstract. We present curlew, an open-source python package for structural geological modelling using neural fields. This modelling framework incorporates various local constraints (value, gradient, orientation and (in)equalities) and tailored global loss functions to ensure data-consistent and geologically realistic predictions. Random Fourier Feature (RFF) encodings are used to improve model convergence and facilitate stochastic uncertainty quantification, while simultaneously improving the model's ability to learn naturally periodic features such as folds. These advances are integrated into a software framework that allows incremental construction of complex geological models through temporally-linked neural fields, each representing a specific deposition, intrusion or faulting event. Significantly, this framework allows semi-supervised learning to integrate diverse unlabelled datasets (e.g., geochemistry, petrophysics), reducing interpretation bias and potentially improving model robustness. We describe and demonstrate these various capabilities using synthetic examples and real data from a faulted stratigraphic digital outcrop model from Newcastle, Australia.
Status: open (until 08 Jan 2026)
-
CEC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-5100 - No compliance with the policy of the journal', Juan Antonio Añel, 07 Dec 2025
reply
-
CC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Samuel Thiele, 15 Dec 2025
reply
Dear Editor,
We have checked the permanent (zenodo) data repository listed in the Code and Data Availability section (https://zenodo.org/records/17190282), and can confirm that it contains all of the datasets used in this paper (and code needed to reproduce our results).
ausgeol.org is mentioned only because it is the original source of the digital outcrop model. We can remove this reference if it is confusing.
Kind regards,
Sam Thiele
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5100-CC1
-
CC1: 'Reply on CEC1', Samuel Thiele, 15 Dec 2025
reply
Viewed
Since the preprint corresponding to this journal article was posted outside of Copernicus Publications, the preprint-related metrics are limited to HTML views.
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 118 | 0 | 3 | 121 | 0 | 0 |
- HTML: 118
- PDF: 0
- XML: 3
- Total: 121
- BibTeX: 0
- EndNote: 0
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Since the preprint corresponding to this journal article was posted outside of Copernicus Publications, the preprint-related metrics are limited to HTML views.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Dear authors,
Unfortunately, after checking your manuscript, it has come to our attention that it does not comply with our "Code and Data Policy".
https://www.geoscientific-model-development.net/policies/code_and_data_policy.html
In your manuscript you have not included permanent repositories for the data used and produced in your work. Also, you cite an ausgeo.org site to store some of the assets, which we can not accept. Therefore, the current situation with your manuscript is irregular. Please, publish all the assets that you have used or generated for your work in one of the appropriate repositories and reply to this comment with the relevant information (link and a permanent identifier for it (e.g. DOI)) as soon as possible, as we can not accept manuscripts in Discussions that do not comply with our policy.
I must note that if you do not fix this problem, we cannot continue with the peer-review process or accept your manuscript for publication in our journal.
Juan A. Añel
Geosci. Model Dev. Executive Editor