Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5078
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5078
23 Oct 2025
 | 23 Oct 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Climate of the Past (CP).

Shaping the mid-Miocene warmth: a sensitivity study on paleogeography, CO2 and model physics

Martin Renoult, Agatha de Boer, and Ellen Berntell

Abstract. The mid-Miocene (15.98 to 13.82 Ma) was a period characterized by substantially warmer temperatures than today and atmospheric CO2 concentrations comparable to near-future projections. Climate models have generally struggled to reproduce proxy-based reconstructions from this interval, particularly at high latitudes where model temperatures are consistently too low. Here, we present new mid-Miocene simulations using an unpublished geography and evaluate the climate's sensitivity to several key components: paleogeography (including land-sea distribution, topography and ice sheets), atmospheric CO2 concentration, atmospheric model choice, and solar forcing. Our baseline mid-Miocene climate yields a global mean surface temperature (GMST) of 19.8 °C. GMST varies by up to 3.2 °C between simulations with CO2 concentrations of two and four times pre-industrial values, which is consistent with estimates for the mid-Miocene. Removal of the Antarctic ice-sheet leads to expected local warming, but nevertheless records an overall global cooling of 1.3 C. Solar forcing and subtle changes of land-sea mask each impact GMST by around 0.2 °C. The choice of atmospheric model substantially affects the simulated mid-Miocene climate through modified feedback mechanisms. We estimate an equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) of 2.9 °C for the mid-Miocene, similar to modern-based estimates from our model, indicating the potential for the Miocene to contribute to constraining equilibrium ECS. Global precipitation is tightly coupled to GMST across all our simulation. As with previous studies, all our simulations, regardless of specific configuration, underestimate high-latitude proxy-reconstructed temperatures. This highlights the need to improve our understanding on polar amplification and the need to use high concentrations of CO2 to compensate for a cold modeled Miocene climate.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Martin Renoult, Agatha de Boer, and Ellen Berntell

Status: open (until 18 Dec 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Martin Renoult, Agatha de Boer, and Ellen Berntell
Martin Renoult, Agatha de Boer, and Ellen Berntell

Viewed

Total article views: 30 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
26 3 1 30 1 1
  • HTML: 26
  • PDF: 3
  • XML: 1
  • Total: 30
  • BibTeX: 1
  • EndNote: 1
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 Oct 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 23 Oct 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 30 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 30 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 24 Oct 2025
Download
Short summary
During the mid-Miocene (~16 to 14 million years ago), Earth was much warmer with CO2 levels similar to what is expected for our future. Here, we perform simulations with a new geography of the mid-Miocene, which include changes in ice coverage, land and sea distribution, solar energy and CO2 concentrations. Despite high CO2 concentrations, our mid-Miocene is too cold compared to geological reconstructions, but shows great potential to understand future climate change and its sensitivity to CO2.
Share