| 23 Oct 2025
Modelling long-term soil organic carbon sequestration under varying environmental drivers and internal protection mechanisms – towards a digital twin
Abstract. Soil organic carbon (SOC) plays a large role in sustainable soil management and climate change mitigation. To understand the potential of soils to sequester additional carbon requires detailed knowledge of the underlying processes and drivers. In this study, we use soil evolution model SoilGen3.8.2 to assess the effects of environmental drivers (bioclimate, erosion level and land use) and four protection mechanisms on long-term SOC dynamics.
The protection mechanisms (aggregation, clay mineralogy, microporosity and metal oxyhydroxides (MOOHs)) showed large differences with different temporal patterns, where aggregation and clay mineralogy dominated during 10 ka of pedogenesis and MOOHs had a negligible effect. Ranking internal and external controls on SOC stocks revealed a decreasing influence of bioclimate > land use > erosion > time > protection mechanism.
Topsoil and subsoil SOC recovery after agricultural use revealed different dynamics, controlled by the history of environmental drivers and pedogenesis. Natural SOC recovery showed lowest rates for subsoils and highest rates for topsoils, with a strong control of erosion and pedogenetic history. The addition of ground rock of different mineralogies to enhance SOC sequestration had some effect, mainly for goethite, montmorillonite and a temporary effect of calcite. Our simulations demonstrate how SoilGen can improve understanding of soil processes, while also highlighting knowledge gaps, such as missing experimental insights in key SOC stabilization mechanisms.
Our study shows that soil models such as SoilGen cannot act as full digital twins of a soil, as not all processes and parameters of the complex soil system are represented. These models can, however, form the basis of topical digital twins, targeting specific processes or properties. We provide a roadmap for developing such topical digital twins and recommend to start from a complex model that accounts for pedogenetic history.
Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors serves as topic editor for the special issue to which this paper belongs.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
