the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
A State-Space Model for Monitoring Greenland Ice Sheet Surface Elevation Change from CryoSat-2
Abstract. We present a data-driven State-Space Model (SSM) for deriving monthly surface elevation changes of the Greenland Ice Sheet from CryoSat-2 radar altimetry (2011–2025). The model combines a Gaussian Markov Random Field for spatial dependence with an autoregressive process for temporal evolution, allowing seasonal cycles and long-term trends to emerge directly from the data.
The resulting 5 km gridded dataset captures both large-scale and local variations, showing widespread thinning along the margins and near-stable conditions in the interior. Validation against ICESat-2, Operation IceBridge, automatic weather stations, and laser-altimetry-based time series shows strong agreement and a 40–45% reduction in noise after smoothing.
This flexible and mission-independent approach provides monthly, uncertainty-quantified elevation change records that enhance understanding of Greenland Ice Sheet dynamics and support long-term, multi-sensor monitoring of its contribution to sea-level rise.
Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of The Cryosphere.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.- Preprint
(9689 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 03 Feb 2026)
-
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-5015', Jichang Shen, 28 Dec 2025
reply
This preprint stands out for its innovative use of a GMRF in processing CryoSat-2 altimeter data, which effectively captures spatiotemporal dependencies to derive robust monthly SEC estimates, even in regions with sparse sampling. However, a notable gap is the lack of direct intercomparison with public datasets such as Zhang et al.’s (2022, ESSD) and Khan et al.’s (2025, ESSD) products (the corresponding references for these two datasets are both cited in this article). Such a comparison would validate trends, strengthen credibility, and highlight the 3D-ECM’s unique value, enhancing the work’s impact upon formal publication.ReplyCitation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/egusphere-2025-5015-CC1
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 154 | 73 | 11 | 238 | 25 | 22 |
- HTML: 154
- PDF: 73
- XML: 11
- Total: 238
- BibTeX: 25
- EndNote: 22
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1