the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
2D Seismic Imaging of the Koillismaa Layered Igneous Complex, North-Eastern Finland
Abstract. The Seismic and Electromagnetics Methods for Deep mineral exploration (SEEMS DEEP) project is associated with the Koillismaa Layered Igneous Complex (KLIC) in north-eastern Finland. The KLIC is characterized by a Bouguer positive gravity and magnetic anomaly zone connecting the two exposed ends of the KLIC i.e. the Koillismaa intrusion and the Näränkävaara intrusion. The KLIC has the potential to host several critical raw minerals, like nickel and cobalt which are included in the European Union’s critical raw material list. For this purpose, two regional seismic profiles were acquired to map the regional reflectivity in the area, constraining the large-scale information about the geological architecture of KLIC. Seismic imaging delineated reflectivity up to a depth of ~5–6 km with several reflective packages at various depths which may be representative of the presence of dykes, faults, and major lithological contacts present in the area. Several regional faults were also imaged. The top of the magma conduit associated with KLIC was successfully mapped with hints of fault-like events cross-cutting the intrusion revealing a more complex internal structure that was earlier assumed of as a single lithological unit. It was interpreted that a second magma conduit might exist between the Koillismaa intrusion and the Näränkävaara Intrusion. Results were compared against the available petrophysical data and a preliminary available geological model based on the density model of the gravity inversion with constraints from the drillhole data.
Competing interests: The contact author has declared that neither they nor their co-authors have competing interests. However, one of the authors (MM) is a member of the editorial board of Solid Earth.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.- Preprint
(3106 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 19 Apr 2025)
-
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-496', Giacomo Medici, 11 Mar 2025
reply
General comments
Very good geophysical research. Please, follow my specific comments to improve the manuscript.
Specific comments
Lines 49-52. “Geophysical surveys for mineral exploration have been routinely accomplished by potential field methods, electromagnetics, electrical methods....depths required to distinguish different lithologies. In comparison, seismic reflection surveys can provide higher-resolution images of the subsurface and have now emerged as an established method for deep mineral exploration in the hardrock environment”. Insert recent papers that discuss the use of electromagnetics, electrical methods and seismic surveys for deep exploration in the hardrock lithologies.
- Medici, G., Ling, F., Shang, J. 2023. Review of discrete fracture network characterization for geothermal energy extraction. Frontiers in Earth Science, 11, 1328397.
- Eberhart‐Phillips, D., Stanley, W. D., Rodriguez, B. D., Lutter, W.J. 1995. Surface seismic and electrical methods to detect fluids related to faulting. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 100(B7), 12919-12936.
Line 67. Clearly state the 3 to 4 specific objectives of your research by using numbers (e.g., i, ii, and iii).
Line 69. “Layered intrusions”. Please, describe in detail the geometries of these geological bodies. The geological scenario is currently unclear.
Lines 69-100. This section needs more detail on the regional stratigraphy.
Lines 69-100. Provide more detail on the presence of faults that I can observe in the geological maps.
Lines 225-262. A discussion should also incorporate literature to show that your research has advanced the field.
Lines 318-409. Improve the literature for either introduction or discussion.
Figures and tables
Figure 1a, c. Make evident the type of faults.
Figure 1b. What the contours represent? Unclear, specify in the caption.
Figure 1b. Increase the graphic resolution.
Figures 7 and 8. These are very important figures, you can make them larger.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-496-CC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
62 | 9 | 2 | 73 | 0 | 0 |
- HTML: 62
- PDF: 9
- XML: 2
- Total: 73
- BibTeX: 0
- EndNote: 0
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1