Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4950
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4950
16 Oct 2025
 | 16 Oct 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).

Laboratory and field assessment of mid-infrared absorption (MIRA) instrument performance for methane and ethane dry mole fractions

Yunsong Liu, Natasha Lynn Miles, Scott James Richardson, Zachary Robert Barkley, David Owen Miller, Jonathan Kofler, Philip Handley, Stephen DeVogel, and Kenneth James Davis

Abstract. Concurrent measurements of methane (CH4) and ethane (C2H6) can be used to identify and separate methane sources, as ethane is present in thermogenic sources (e.g., oil and natural gas) but not in biogenic sources (e.g., agriculture). In this study, we evaluated the performance of multiple Aeris MIRA Ultra instruments (Versions 1 and 2) through controlled laboratory tests and tower-based deployments under field conditions. The systems were modified with an external pump, flow control, a Nafion dryer, and a custom-built auxiliary box to automate the system and transmit near real-time data. We determined the best calibration approach for our application, given practical limitations, to be a full calibration cycle (with ambient and high calibration cylinders) about once per day and an ambient calibration cylinder sampled hourly. Measurement uncertainty was assessed, including the uncertainty due to instrument noise as a function of calibration frequency, uncertainty in the water vapor correction, and cylinder assignment uncertainty. Instrument noise was the dominant source of uncertainty for C2H6, while the water vapor correction dominated the CH4 uncertainty. For Version 2 systems with hourly calibrations and a Nafion dryer with counterflow, the mean total uncertainty, including both systematic errors and noise, of hourly averages was 0.8–3.0 ppb CH4 and 0.35–0.37 ppb C2H6. Laboratory intercomparisons showed network compatibility within 1.2 ppb CH4 and 0.23 ppb C2H6, and a collocated deployment with a NOAA Picarro system agreed within 1.8 ppb CH4. Instrument noise varied substantially amongst the instruments, with errors reaching up to 11 ppb CH4 and 2 ppb C2H6 for hourly means, with similar variability indicated in a 50-h cylinder test. With appropriate engineering and calibration, the Aeris MIRAUltra shows the capability to measure ethane and methane with sufficient stability to distinguish regional methane emission sources in many field settings.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Yunsong Liu, Natasha Lynn Miles, Scott James Richardson, Zachary Robert Barkley, David Owen Miller, Jonathan Kofler, Philip Handley, Stephen DeVogel, and Kenneth James Davis

Status: open (until 21 Nov 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Yunsong Liu, Natasha Lynn Miles, Scott James Richardson, Zachary Robert Barkley, David Owen Miller, Jonathan Kofler, Philip Handley, Stephen DeVogel, and Kenneth James Davis
Yunsong Liu, Natasha Lynn Miles, Scott James Richardson, Zachary Robert Barkley, David Owen Miller, Jonathan Kofler, Philip Handley, Stephen DeVogel, and Kenneth James Davis
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 16 Oct 2025
Download
Short summary
This manuscript details laboratory and field-based testing of a tower-based methane and ethane measurement system to address the challenge of separating methane sources in oil and gas basins. We describe methods for managing water vapor, calibration, and estimating the various components of measurement uncertainty. With appropriate engineering and calibration, the instrument shows the capability to measure CH4 and C2H6 with sufficient stability to distinguish regional methane emission sources.
Share