Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4932
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4932
06 Nov 2025
 | 06 Nov 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Earth Surface Dynamics (ESurf).

On the testing of grain shape corrections to bedload transport equations with grain-resolved numerical simulations

Yulan Chen, Orencio Durán, and Thomas Pähtz

Abstract. Using grain-resolved LES-DEM simulations, Zhang et al. (J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 130, e2024JF007937, 2025) aimed to validate a grain-shape-corrected bedload transport equation proposed earlier by the same group. It states that grain shape effects are captured through a modified Shields number that depends, among others, on the drag coefficient, CDsettle, determined from the force balance for a grain settling in a fluid at rest. To independently vary CDsettle in their simulations, the authors changed the boundary conditions on the grains' surfaces: By artificially shifting the locations of the no-slip conditions from the actual grain surface to a virtual surface a distance l into the grain interior, they hoped to well approximate Navier-slip conditions with a slip length l. Here, we argue that this approximation is appropriate only if the thickness of the boundary layer that forms around the virtual surface is much larger than l, which we demonstrate was not the case for the authors' simulations. In particular, using independent DNS-DEM grain settling simulations for the same hydrodynamic conditions, we directly show that this approximation substantially overestimates the value of CDsettle of a Navier-slip sphere. This implies that the conditions created with their artificial method do not correspond to physically realistic scenarios and therefore do not support the authors' grain shape correction. To support this conclusion, we demonstrate that their entire numerical data can be alternatively explained by a simple null hypothesis model, without grain shape correction, based on the virtual-grain rather than the actual-grain size.

Competing interests: O.D. is a member of the editorial board of Earth Surface Dynamics.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Yulan Chen, Orencio Durán, and Thomas Pähtz

Status: open (until 18 Dec 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Yulan Chen, Orencio Durán, and Thomas Pähtz
Yulan Chen, Orencio Durán, and Thomas Pähtz

Viewed

Total article views: 36 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
35 1 0 36 0 0
  • HTML: 35
  • PDF: 1
  • XML: 0
  • Total: 36
  • BibTeX: 0
  • EndNote: 0
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Nov 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 06 Nov 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 36 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 36 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 07 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
Bedload transport occurs when a sufficiently strong flow of fluid shears a bed of loose sedimentary grains of millimeter or larger size. Here, we show that a recently proposed artificial numerical method to alter fluid-particle interactions in grain-resolved numerical bedload simulations is physically unrealistic. We conclude, supported by independent modeling, that data created using this method, unlike previously claimed, does not resolve the issue of grain shape effects on bedload transport.
Share