Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4911
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4911
17 Oct 2025
 | 17 Oct 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Annales Geophysicae (ANGEO).

Magnetotail response to corotating interaction region driven geomagnetic storms: Cluster observations

Adriane Marques de Souza Franco, Rashmi Rawat, Mauricio José Alves Bolzan, and Ezequiel Echer

Abstract. In this work we have selected 40 corotating/stream interaction (CIR) driven geomagnetic storms that occurred between 2001 and 2016, and statistically studied their impacts on the magnetotail. The wavelet transform was applied to the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) Bz component, magnetotail Bx component, and the auroral electrojet (AE) index during geomagnetic storms. The cross-wavelet technique was applied to determine the periods of higher correlation between the IMF Bz × Tail Bx, IMF Bz × AE index and Tail Bx × AE index. More than 80 % of the most energetic periods in the IMF Bz and magnetotail Bx are found to be shorter than 4 hours, independently of the storm phase. The AE index presented the range between 2–4 hours as the most common with energetic periods for both storm phases. In the recovery phase, periodicities in the AE index are more spread (≤ 12 hours) than for the main phase (≤ 8 hours) probably due to the presence of high-intensity long-duration continuous AE activities (HILDCAAs). From the cross-wavelet analysis (IMF Bz × magnetotail Bx, IMF Bz × AE index and magnetotail Bx × AE index), periods ≤ 4 hours are found to be dominant in both storm phases, which coincide with the cyclic substorm periods. The power spectral analysis showed that the IMF Bz and magnetotail Bx time series follow the Kolmogorov (-5/3) power law. Additionally, the mean values of the spectral indices for the magnetotail Bx and AE index are higher during the recovery phase than the main phase. This suggests that turbulence is more pronounced during the recovery phase of geomagnetic storms driven by CIRs.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Adriane Marques de Souza Franco, Rashmi Rawat, Mauricio José Alves Bolzan, and Ezequiel Echer

Status: open (until 28 Nov 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Adriane Marques de Souza Franco, Rashmi Rawat, Mauricio José Alves Bolzan, and Ezequiel Echer
Adriane Marques de Souza Franco, Rashmi Rawat, Mauricio José Alves Bolzan, and Ezequiel Echer

Viewed

Total article views: 61 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
51 6 4 61 3 3
  • HTML: 51
  • PDF: 6
  • XML: 4
  • Total: 61
  • BibTeX: 3
  • EndNote: 3
Views and downloads (calculated since 17 Oct 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 17 Oct 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 60 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 60 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 22 Oct 2025
Download
Short summary
This study analyzed 40 corotating interaction region driven geomagnetic storms to see how they affect Earth's magnetic tail. We found that short, rapid energy pulses (4 hours) dominated the magnetotail (cyclic substorm periods). Further, the HILDCAA events that occur during the recovery phase could cause a spread of energy to periodicities of 2 to 12 h in the auroral region. Spectral indices results suggest a strong turbulence in the magnetotail and auroral regions during recovery phases.
Share