Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4870
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4870
04 Dec 2025
 | 04 Dec 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).

Dependence of Seismic Hazard Assessment on the Observation Time Interval: Insights from a Synthetic Earthquake Catalogue in Southeastern Spain

Elena Pascual-Sánchez, José Antonio Álvarez-Gómez, Julián García-Mayordomo, and Paula Herrero-Barbero

Abstract. Traditionally Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment (PSHA) is mainly based on historical and instrumental catalogues. The seismic catalogue in SE Spain covers a period of almost 1 kyr. Although this catalog can be considered long, its time span is not enough to record the complete seismic cycle of the slow moving regional faults, for example, the ones which conform the Eastern Betics Shear Zone (EBSZ). To assess whether the seismic hazard at the EBSZ depends on the time interval in which the earthquake catalogue has been recorded, this study performs a PSHA using synthetic seismicity. The synthetic seismicity in the EBSZ consists of a 1 Myr catalogue generated in previous studies using the RSQSim earthquake simulator, applied to the fault system that forms the EBSZ. This catalogue has been divided into ten thousand sub-catalogues of the same duration as the historical and instrumental one and randomly distributed over time. The magnitude-frequency distributions of the synthetic sub-catalogues show significant variability in the maximum reached magnitude, in the slope of the Gutenberg-Richter relationship and in the annual rate of earthquakes. A hundred sub-catalogues have been selected to perform individual PSHA and have been compared with the results derived from historical and instrumental seismicity. Using R-CRISIS software, this study obtains seismic hazard curves for the main cities in the region, showing the estimated return period for different values of Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA). The hazard curves reveal that each sub-catalogue leads to different return period values. The obtained variability ranges from 11 % to 21% for a PGA = 0.04 g, and from 25 % to 58 % for a PGA = 1 g. Our results show that there is a dependence between seismic hazard and the observation time interval in which an earthquake catalogue is recorded.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Elena Pascual-Sánchez, José Antonio Álvarez-Gómez, Julián García-Mayordomo, and Paula Herrero-Barbero

Status: open (until 15 Jan 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Elena Pascual-Sánchez, José Antonio Álvarez-Gómez, Julián García-Mayordomo, and Paula Herrero-Barbero
Elena Pascual-Sánchez, José Antonio Álvarez-Gómez, Julián García-Mayordomo, and Paula Herrero-Barbero
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 04 Dec 2025
Download
Short summary
This study explores whether seismic hazard depends on the time interval over which an earthquake catalogue is recorded. Using a synthetic earthquake catalogue from the Eastern Betics Shear Zone spanning 1 Myr, we divided it into 10,000 sub-catalogues, each with the same duration as the historical and instrumental catalogue – i.e., 1,000 years. The resulting hazard curves, derived from a probabilistic seismic hazard assessment, show that each sub-catalogue yields different return period values.
Share