the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
40Ar/39Ar constraints on the eruption history of the Christiana Volcano of the Christiana-Santorini-Kolumbo volcanic field, Greece
Abstract. The Christiana Islands group consists of three at present uninhabited islands 20 km SW of Santorini, Aegean Sea, Greece, that are the subaerial remnants of the Christiana volcano. The age of the Christiana Islands has been unclear and has been previously assumed to have started around the same time as the emergence of Santorini (600 ka). Other studies, based on seismic reflection studies have correlated volcanic deposits of the Christiana archipelago to Pliocene sedimentary layers. This study reports new groundmass 40Ar/39Ar ages of ten volcanic samples from Christiana Island. Subaerial Christiana volcanic rocks of the Upper Lava formation cluster tightly between 2.5–2.7 Ma with relatively small uncertainties (0.02–0.14 Ma). One sample dated much younger: 133 ka; this is most likely derived from the Middle Pumice Plinian eruption of Santorini. The 2.5–2.7 Ma age for Christiana volcano shows that all volcanic fields of the South Aegean Volcanic Arc (SAVA) were active around 3 Ma ago and started when oceanic crust arrived at 100 km depth below the SAVA volcanic fields after long periods of continental lithosphere subduction. The Christiana volcano was constructed when the local stress field showed NNE-SSW extension. During the transition from NNE-SSW to NW-SE extension the Christiana volcano became extinct and a period of >1.0 Ma with volcanic quiescence and/or low volcanic output followed until the start of submarine volcano Poseidon and present-day volcanic centres Santorini and Kolumbo.
- Preprint
(4274 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1890 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 03 Dec 2025)
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-4857', Su-Chin Chang, 02 Nov 2025 reply
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-4857', Tim Druitt, 02 Nov 2025
reply
This is an important and scientifically robust contribution to our understanding of the history of Aegean volcanism. The paper is very well written and illustrated, and I have no significant criticisms. My only recommendation is that if possible the authors add photographs of the sample locations. For example, it would be hard to find the outcrop of Santorini sample C18-14A without a photo. The authors may like to look at Karstens, J et al. Revised Minoan eruption volume as benchmark for large volcanic eruptions. Nature communications, 14(1), p.2497. for the volume of the Minoan eruption, and Metcalfe, A. et al. Tectonic modulation of caldera volcanism on the South Aegean Volcanic Arc. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 671, p.119633 for age revisions for Santorini volcanism. Overall I congratulate the authors on a very nice piece of work. Tim Druitt
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4857-RC2
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 120 | 31 | 16 | 167 | 27 | 8 | 7 |
- HTML: 120
- PDF: 31
- XML: 16
- Total: 167
- Supplement: 27
- BibTeX: 8
- EndNote: 7
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
The manuscript titled "40Ar/39Ar constraints on the eruption history of the Christiana Volcano of the Christiana-Santorini-Kolumbo volcanic field, Greece" offers a new and robust age determination, contributing to the understanding of the tectonic evolution of the Aegean arc. The scientific motivation of this study is clear, and the results facilitate the resolution of the long-standing debate concerning the age of the Christiana-Santorini-Kolumbo volcanic field. The methodology and findings presented in the manuscript are well-articulated, with all figures being well-organized, thereby facilitating comprehension for the reader.
Nevertheless, the introduction and the geological background could be slightly revised, as the existing content lacks clarity for readers unfamiliar with the regional geology. Other than that, the overall quality of the manuscript is commendably high.