Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4838
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4838
04 Dec 2025
 | 04 Dec 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).

Systematic Assessment of the RFI Environment in Passive Microwave Bands for Earth Observation from 6 to 200 GHz

Raul Onrubia, Roger Oliva, David Duncan, Niels Bormann, Jose Barbosa, Ioannis Nestoras, Adriano Jordão, Flavio Jorge, Juliette Challot, and Yan Soldo

Abstract. Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) is spreading worldwide, affecting numerous Earth Observation (EO) instruments. Among these, microwave radiometers play an essential role, providing critical measurements for climate monitoring, weather forecasting, and numerous other applications. In order to plan for future satellite missions and fully exploit currently available measurements, it is crucial to study the contamination levels at bands where radiometers operate. This work presents the Earth Observation RFI Scanner (EORFIScan), an RFI detection system for EO products that combines multiple RFI detection techniques in order to reduce missed detections. This software has been used to survey several passive microwave bands from 6 GHz up to 200 GHz, including both exclusive and shared bands. Analysis and validation of this method is presented for the year 2022. The resulting RFI probability maps show significant contamination in the bands up to and including 18.7 GHz. A few brightness temperatures in the range of 350–400 K have been observed at 23.8 GHz and one at 36.5 GHz, which suggest the presence of man-made emissions. At higher frequencies, RFI contamination is not clearly visible in the analysed data. Comparisons with simulated radiances from a numerical weather prediction model are presented as a way to evaluate the RFI detection, finding that flagged observations are typically warmer than model simulations, as would be expected for RFI. It is clear from the results presented that RFI is already a concern for users at lower frequency passive microwave bands, and it is recommended that real-time monitoring systems are developed to keep an eye on the evolving threat of RFI in EO bands.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Raul Onrubia, Roger Oliva, David Duncan, Niels Bormann, Jose Barbosa, Ioannis Nestoras, Adriano Jordão, Flavio Jorge, Juliette Challot, and Yan Soldo

Status: open (until 08 Jan 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Raul Onrubia, Roger Oliva, David Duncan, Niels Bormann, Jose Barbosa, Ioannis Nestoras, Adriano Jordão, Flavio Jorge, Juliette Challot, and Yan Soldo
Raul Onrubia, Roger Oliva, David Duncan, Niels Bormann, Jose Barbosa, Ioannis Nestoras, Adriano Jordão, Flavio Jorge, Juliette Challot, and Yan Soldo

Viewed

Total article views: 96 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
64 28 4 96 3 2
  • HTML: 64
  • PDF: 28
  • XML: 4
  • Total: 96
  • BibTeX: 3
  • EndNote: 2
Views and downloads (calculated since 04 Dec 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 04 Dec 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 89 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 89 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 06 Dec 2025
Download
Short summary
We studied how common unwanted man-made radio frequency interferes affect Earth observation satellites used for weather and climate studies. We scanned frequencies from 6 to 200 GHz in 2022. We found strong interference at lower ranges, including first signs at 23.8 and 36.5 gigahertz, while higher ranges were mostly clean. These results highlight the need for real-time monitoring, stronger protection from authorities, and on-board and on-ground mitigation systems in EO missions.
Share