the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Reconstructing albedo from mean cloud properties
Abstract. Liquid marine clouds exert a substantial control on the Earth-atmosphere energy system through their large global coverage and high reflectivity of shortwave radiation, resulting in overall negative radiative impact. Previous studies showed that the two dominant factors determining their albedo are cloud fraction (CF) and liquid water path (LWP), but this relationship varies in regions of high aerosol loading. In this work, a simplified kernel was built to assess how well the top of atmosphere (TOA) all-sky albedo (α) can be estimated from the given properties of marine liquid clouds: CF, LWP and cloud droplet number concentration (Nd), and to what extent this approach applies globally. The study uses data retrieved from MODIS and CERES instruments for a near-global ocean domain (60º S–60º N) covering the period 2003–2021. The results showed that the albedo is only reconstructed to within 10 % in less than 40 % of cases. Several modifications of investigated method were tested for the improvement in albedo reconstructions. It was found that the number of biases decreases when the maximum solar zenith angle is considered, as well as if the CF–LWP–Nd–α kernel is calculated on a 1º latitude-longitude grid. The findings show that the relationship between the TOA albedo of a scene of clouds and the retrieved mean cloud properties is not universal and while accounting for regional variation is one way to address this, a better understanding of this effect is still needed to reduce uncertainty in aerosol-cloud interactions.
- Preprint
(1194 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 01 Dec 2025)
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-4784', Anonymous Referee #1, 13 Nov 2025 reply
-
CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-4784', Jesse Loveridge, 14 Nov 2025
reply
Comment on egusphere-2025-4784
The subject of how mean albedo relates to mean cloud properties has been the focus of decades of investigative effort, but these works and their insight are not represented or cited in this article. I have listed a few references below as a starting point (e.g., Cahalan et al., 1994; Oreopoulos & Davies; 1998; Rossow et al. 2002), including some about how the issue of cloud heterogeneity is represented in the radiative transfer schemes of climate models. I recommend the authors read them and other associated works (far more relevant works exist than I have listed) and revise this article to place their results within the context of our existing knowledge about radiative transfer through cloudy atmospheres.
References
Barker, H. W. and Räisänen, P.: Radiative sensitivities for cloud structural properties that are unresolved by conventional GCMs, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 131, 3103–3122, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.04.174, 2005.
Barker, H. W., Wiellicki, B. A., and Parker, L.: A Parameterization for Computing Grid-Averaged Solar Fluxes for Inhomogeneous Marine Boundary Layer Clouds. Part II: Validation Using Satellite Data, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 53, 2304–2316, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1996)053%253C2304:APFCGA%253E2.0.CO;2, 1996.
Boutle, I. A., Abel, S. J., Hill, P. G., and Morcrette, C. J.: Spatial variability of liquid cloud and rain: observations and microphysical effects, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 140, 583–594, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2140, 2014.
Cahalan, R. F., Ridgway, W., Wiscombe, W. J., Bell, T. L., and Snider, J. B.: The Albedo of Fractal Stratocumulus Clouds, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 51, 2434–2455, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1994)051%253C2434:TAOFSC%253E2.0.CO;2, 1994.
Hill, P. G., Morcrette, C. J., and Boutle, I. A.: A regime-dependent parametrization of subgrid-scale cloud water content variability, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 141, 1975–1986, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2506, 2015.
Kawai, H. and Teixeira, J.: Probability Density Functions of Liquid Water Path and Total Water Content of Marine Boundary Layer Clouds: Implications for Cloud Parameterization, Journal of Climate, 25, 2162–2177, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00117.1, 2012.
Oreopoulos, L. and Cahalan, R. F.: Cloud Inhomogeneity from MODIS, Journal of Climate, 18, 5110–5124, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3591.1, 2005.
Oreopoulos, L. and Davies, R.: Plane Parallel Albedo Biases from Satellite Observations. Part I: Dependence on Resolution and Other Factors, Journal of Climate, 11, 919–932, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1998)011%253C0919:PPABFS%253E2.0.CO;2, 1998.
Rossow, W. B., Delo, C., and Cairns, B.: Implications of the Observed Mesoscale Variations of Clouds for the Earth’s Radiation Budget, Journal of Climate, 15, 557–585, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015%253C0557:IOTOMV%253E2.0.CO;2, 2002.
Zhang, F., Liang, X.-Z., Li, J., and Zeng, Q.: Dominant roles of subgrid-scale cloud structures in model diversity of cloud radiative effects, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 118, 7733–7749, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50604, 2013.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4784-CC1 -
RC2: 'Additional comment from Ref#1 on egusphere-2025-4784', Anonymous Referee #1, 14 Nov 2025
reply
After thinking about the approach used in the paper a little more I (Referee #1) have a further, potentially more serious, concern about the bias calculations for the albedo estimated from the Cf-Nd-LWP binned approach. It particularly applies for the estimate from the 1x1 degree resolution binned estimates, but it would be worth looking into for the global estimates too. I’m afraid that this may affect the conclusions of the paper and require some additional analysis and re-writing (although likely only for the 1x1 degree resolution part I think).
For the 1x1 deg correction is there a chance that each bin in the CF-LWP-Nd space is only filled once so that the mean over time for each bin contains only one value. Then when matching the daily MODIS datapoints to a value from the look-up-table, the value selected will not be the time-average of several points, but simply the same value again? This might then lead to the very small errors observed (assuming that the kernel method is a good match to the CERES observation). So this then becomes a test of the kernel method rather than testing the utility of using a time averaged look-up-table estimate. I.e., it would not be a good test of how well the look-up-table approach would work for new datapoints given just the values of CF, Nd and LWP (without the extra information that presumably goes into the kernel calculation).
For each 1x1 datapoint in the daily MODIS record for 2003–2021 (19 years) there are around 19*365 = 6935 data points. But there are a total of 50*40*30=60,000 bins in the CF-Nd-LWP space used. This might make it likely that some (all?) of the bins are only used once – although some bins are likely more populated than others.
Therefore, you should examine how many datapoints are being used to calculate the average albedo in each bin for the 1x1 degree binned look-up-tables and come up with a statistical measure for how many datapoints you would need in a given bin for the bias estimate to be useful (i.e., a useful measure of how good the look-up-table approach would be for estimating the albedo of datapoints that weren’t used in the look-up-table (using only CF, Nd and LWP). It would be good to do this for the other estimates too (e.g., the global mean binned look-up-table, 5x5 degree, etc.).
Perhaps a better approach would be to build the look-up-table using only part of the MODIS/CERES record and then to calculate the biases vs CERES using the other part of the MODIS/CERES record. This would ensure that the same data is not used for the kernel calculation and the bias testing.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4784-RC2 -
RC3: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-4784', Anonymous Referee #2, 21 Nov 2025
reply
Please find the review attached.
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 142 | 44 | 22 | 208 | 14 | 11 |
- HTML: 142
- PDF: 44
- XML: 22
- Total: 208
- BibTeX: 14
- EndNote: 11
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Please see the attached PDF for the review.