Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4777
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4777
06 Oct 2025
 | 06 Oct 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).

Quality aspects of Fengyun3 D/E radio occultation bending angle products

Ying Li, Yan Liu, Wenwu Ding, Mi Liao, Xingliang Huo, and Jinying Ye

Abstract. This study systematically evaluated the quality of ionosphere-corrected bending angles from Fengyun3 (FY3) D/E satellites (equipped with GPS and BDS receivers) using ERA5 data as references and MetOp products as comparisons. The quality of subsequent retrieved optimized bending angles, refractivity, and temperature were also analysed. Ionosphere-corrected bending angle were assessed via two approaches: outlier detection across 10–80 km and bias/noise quantification. Overall quality evaluation showed that FY3 ionosphere-corrected bending angles were consistent with MetOp below 40 km. Above 40 km, FY3 bending angles exhibited larger errors than MetOp. In outlier detection, MetOp had nearly 0 % bad profiles, followed by FY3D (<10 %), while FY3E (GPS/BDS) had about 20 % bad profiles. FY3E-GPS bending angles are prone to have large outliers in the height range of 35–50 km. For bias and noise quantification, the daily mean biases and noise levels of FY3 satellites were higher than those of MetOp. Specifically, FY3E-GPS showed notable large daily mean biases of about −0.4 μrad and most of these biases are in rising RO events. FY3D and FY3E-BDS ranked second, with biases of approximately −0.1 μrad. MetOp had the smallest biases, at around –0.05 μrad. Regarding noises, FY3D, FY3E-GPS exhibited comparable noise levels, at roughly 2.5 μrad; FY3E-BDS had lower noises of 1.5 μrad. MetOp noises are smallest which are about 1.0 μrad. Due to the larger biases and noises at high altitudes, FY3’s optimized bending angles were strongly corrected by background bending angles. Refractivity and temperature were also influenced by the strong correction of optimized bending angle. In summary, FY3 ionosphere-bending angles show high quality below 40 km. However, at high altitudes, further efforts are required to improve the quality issue for improving FY3 data’s utility in numerical weather prediction and climate studies, especially for stratospheric applications.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Ying Li, Yan Liu, Wenwu Ding, Mi Liao, Xingliang Huo, and Jinying Ye

Status: open (until 11 Nov 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Ying Li, Yan Liu, Wenwu Ding, Mi Liao, Xingliang Huo, and Jinying Ye
Ying Li, Yan Liu, Wenwu Ding, Mi Liao, Xingliang Huo, and Jinying Ye
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 06 Oct 2025
Download
Short summary
Fengyun radio occultation products are useful for numerical weather prediction (NWP). However, its accuracy required to be further improved from middle stratosphere above. We developed a quality control scheme and evaluate the Fengyun bending angles’ quality. The new quality control scheme are useful in rejecting outliers and products’ quality have been well understood. The results are promising in improving the performance of Fengyun data in NWP and climate applications.
Share