the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Multi-Scale Hydraulic and Petrophysical Characterization of a Heterogeneous Fault Zone in the Gotthard Massif's Crystalline Basement
Abstract. Accurately characterizing fault zones in crystalline basement rocks is essential for understanding fluid migration in the Earth's crust and how this influences fault stability and seismicity. While it is known that fault zones exhibit strong heterogeneity in structure and hydraulic properties, quantifying these variations across scales remains a challenge. The study presented investigates a deeply buried fault zone intersected by two inclined boreholes within a high overburden underground research laboratory (URL). As part of the FEAR (Fault Activation and Earthquake Rupture) project, this work provides key hydraulic and structural constraints needed to select and prepare experimental injection sites. These findings pose a necessary foundation for developing controlled fluid injection experiments and emphasize the importance of understanding scale-related effects during multi-scale observations. Through a combination of field-scale hydraulic testing, geophysical logging, and petrophysical analyses of core samples, we evaluate permeability, porosity, wave velocities, and fracture characteristics across multiple structural facies and on varying scales. The study finds that permeability varies over several orders of magnitude, largely controlled by the presence and connectivity of open fractures. Comparisons between lab and field data reveal pronounced scale effects, with lab tests underestimating the in-situ permeability due to the exclusion of large fractures and structural discontinuities. The fault zone shows a combination of localized and distributed flow behaviours, with no evidence of a continuous low-permeability fault core.
- Preprint
(4049 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 11 Dec 2025)
- CC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-4733', Giacomo Medici, 07 Nov 2025 reply
Data sets
DataSets Tom Schaber https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17233183
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 154 | 20 | 7 | 181 | 5 | 4 |
- HTML: 154
- PDF: 20
- XML: 7
- Total: 181
- BibTeX: 5
- EndNote: 4
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
General comments
Very good hydro-geophysical research that needs some more detail before publication. See my specific comments to fix minor issues.
Specific comments
Line 49. “to field projects reaching dimensions in the decametre range”. Please, integrate recent literature that combines laboratory scale measurements to hydraulic tests with decametre ranges including straddle packer systems:
- Quinn, P., Cherry, J. A., Parker, B.L. 2012. Hydraulic testing using a versatile straddle packer system for improved transmissivity estimation in fractured-rock boreholes. Hydrogeology Journal, 20(8), 1529-1547.
- Agbotui, P.Y., Firouzbehi, F., Medici, G. 2025. Review of effective porosity in sandstone aquifers: insights for representation of contaminant transport. Sustainability, 17, (14), 6469.
Line 68. Clearly state the aim of your research.
Line 68. Specify and describe the objectives of your research by using numbers (e.g., i, ii, and iii).
Line 111. “mini-frac campaign”. Specify that techniques used during this campaign.
Line 199. Have you always used the Darcy’s Law in the manuscript for permeability? Or another one before?
Line 226. Optical and acoustic televiewer logs. Can you specify the logging speed? It strongly affects the quality of the images and the structure picking.
Line 277. What do you mean by “channelized flow” opposed to linear? Non-Darcian / non laminar? These words are also used in karst hydrology for conduit flow in cavities with approximate pipe-shape.
Figures and tables
Figure 4a. Make the letters much larger.
Figure 10. Important figure that can attract attention to a public of either geo-physicist or hydro-geologists. Please, try to improve. Who knows it might be incorporated in textbooks!
Figure 10. Make the words larger.
Figure 10. “Laboratory”, “in situ-borehole”, and “meso-macro scale”. Please, specify the techniques used.
Figure 11. I remind explanation for channelized flow.