Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Annales Geophysicae (ANGEO).
Earth’s magnetosheath: A comparison of plasma flow direction between models and observations
Marek Vandasand Evgeny Romashets
Abstract. Observations of the plasma flow direction in the Earth’s magnetosheath are compared with the help of three analytical magnetic-field models, namely Kobel and Flückiger (1994), Romashets and Vandas (2019), and Vandas and Romashets (2019), which all assume current-free fields in the magnetosheath. 47 magnetosheath passages by spacecraft are analyzed in detail and performance of the models are evaluated. It is concluded that the performances are comparable and that they are satisfactory on average. Therefore, a usage of the model by Kobel and Flückiger (1994) is recommended, because it is the simplest one and yields results much faster.
Received: 23 Sep 2025 – Discussion started: 21 Oct 2025
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Observations of the plasma flow direction in the Earth’s magnetosheath are compared with the help of three analytical magnetic-fieldmodels, namely Kobel and Flückiger (1994), Romashets and Vandas (2019), and Vandas and Romashets (2019), which all assume current-free fields in the magnetosheath. 47 magnetosheath passages by spacecraft are analyzed in detail and performance of the models are evaluated. It is concluded that the performances are comparable and that they are satisfactory on average.
Observations of the plasma flow direction in the Earth’s magnetosheath are compared with the...