Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4671
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4671
15 Oct 2025
 | 15 Oct 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).

Seasonal influence on post-fire debris flow likelihood after the 2020 Lake Fire

Jeng-Hann Chong, Adit Ghosh, Brandon T. Page, Gregory Jesmok, Denise V. Berg, Marlene Lopez, Deepshika Upadhyay, David J. Stone, Scott C. Hauswirth, Eric O. Lindsey, and Louis A. Scuderi

Abstract. The increasing severity of wildfires in Western North America is widely hypothesized to lead to an increased likelihood of post-fire debris flows (PFDF), specifically those triggered by high-intensity rain. PFDF likelihoods are highest in the first year and tend to decrease over time. However, it is not well understood how seasonal variation affects the PFDFs initiation in the years following a fire. Here, we monitored the changes in PFDF likelihood of the 2020 Lake Fire in Southern California over a span of four years using field and satellite observations, together with numerical modeling for a subset of drainage basins. We found that unsaturated hydraulic conductivity increased by an order of magnitude during the dry season as compared to the wet season, significantly reducing the PFDF likelihood. Our simulations show that vegetation cover has a smaller impact on PFDF likelihood as compared to hydraulic conductivity or grain size. This study helps clarify the impacts of hydraulic conductivity, grain size, and vegetation on PFDF due to seasonal variation in these parameters for four years after the fire. We suggest that field measurements and modeling approaches should consider how different climatic and seasonal patterns could influence PFDF several years after fires.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Jeng-Hann Chong, Adit Ghosh, Brandon T. Page, Gregory Jesmok, Denise V. Berg, Marlene Lopez, Deepshika Upadhyay, David J. Stone, Scott C. Hauswirth, Eric O. Lindsey, and Louis A. Scuderi

Status: open (until 26 Nov 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Jeng-Hann Chong, Adit Ghosh, Brandon T. Page, Gregory Jesmok, Denise V. Berg, Marlene Lopez, Deepshika Upadhyay, David J. Stone, Scott C. Hauswirth, Eric O. Lindsey, and Louis A. Scuderi
Jeng-Hann Chong, Adit Ghosh, Brandon T. Page, Gregory Jesmok, Denise V. Berg, Marlene Lopez, Deepshika Upadhyay, David J. Stone, Scott C. Hauswirth, Eric O. Lindsey, and Louis A. Scuderi

Viewed

Total article views: 47 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
40 5 2 47 6 0 1
  • HTML: 40
  • PDF: 5
  • XML: 2
  • Total: 47
  • Supplement: 6
  • BibTeX: 0
  • EndNote: 1
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Oct 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 15 Oct 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 47 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 47 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 17 Oct 2025
Download
Short summary
Post-fire debris flows or mudflows can occur after wildfires during intense rainfalls. Yet, it is unclear how seasonal variation changes the debris flow initiation years after the fire. Our simulations show that it is difficult for debris flows to trigger in dry soil during drier months, even four years after the fire. These results highlight the effect of climatic and seasonal patterns in causing post-fire debris flows.
Share