the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Image-based tracking of mixed-sized surface sands and gravels under ultraviolet lights in a shallow flume
Abstract. Simultaneous characterization of the size and organization of both static and moving sediment particles would help to better understand bedform development in river channels. In the current study, an image-based particle tracking method was developed to measure the pathways of sediment particles in transport and visualize their interactions with evolving sedimentary bedforms in flume experiments. The method is novel because it: i) uses ultraviolet lights, fluorescent paint and image segmentation to obtain size class-specific videos of sediment transport over a mixed bed; ii) applies a blob-detection method included in a standalone software (TracTrac – Heyman, 2019) to detect and track particles at rest and in motion; and iii) includes a custom post-processing algorithm that includes a grid-based probabilistic motion model to minimize error in the inferred connections between particle positions on a path. We applied the algorithms on a set of videos taken during a laboratory experiment in which a pair of alternate bars and a cross-over central bar were forming in a shallow flume with non-cohesive sand and gravel transport. When the method works well, as it did for the case of particles in the 2.4–4.0 mm size class (~7 pixels in nominal diameter), the method resulted in an error of +7 % for the number of tracks and -20 % for the average duration of tracks. This degree of accuracy allowed us to analyse the locations of static particles and sediment pathways to show how the active sediment corridor shifted across the frame and then changed angles from the initial trajectories as the set of bars developed. Success of the method is reliant on accurate detection of tracer positions and the ability to predict connections between two identified positions with a motion model. Recommendations are given for application of the method and further testing to reduce reliance on subjective parameters.
- Preprint
(3321 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(99810 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
- RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-4669', Anonymous Referee #1, 01 Nov 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-4669', Anonymous Referee #2, 02 Dec 2025
The manuscript presents a new method for detecting and tracking particles in flume experiments to better understand sediment transport and bedform development in geophysical flows. For this, the study introduces an image-based particle tracking method that uses ultraviolet lights, fluorescent paint, and image segmentation to first detect and then track sediment particles of different size classes ranging from 1.18 to 5.6 mm. The method combines the existing TracTrac software with a custom post-processing algorithm to improve tracking accuracy. The post-processing algorithm incorporates a grid-based probabilistic motion model to distinguish between static and moving particles and to account for missing detections. Although the methodology proposed by the authors is really interesting for our field, with newer and better tools to measure sediment transport. I do feel that the manuscript style would fit other technical journals and not Earth Surface Dynamics. My main concern is about sections 2.4 and 2.5 that are very informative about the MATLAB codes and algorithms that were written and they should be presented in Supplementary Information. These sections are too descriptive. Therefore, I cannot recommend its publication as the way it is presented.
Please see some major and minor comments below:
Major comments:
In the introduction, the authors present a list of previous studies that are already obsolete in the field of image-processing. Most of the works exhibited in the introduction are from the -90’s and early 2000. There are many new and better techniques that the authors should update in the introduction, so they can compare their new method.
More than half of the manuscript focuses on the implementation of the method, which I think it is important, but perhaps not for the readers of ESurfDynamics. Therefore, I think the authors should restructure the paper in case they want to submit to these specific journals.
I have some concerns about the detection of the particles and the way that images are preprocessed for the tracking method. Figure 3 shows an image segmentation example that I do not think it is detecting the particles in the ROI very well (see Fig.3c). Therefore, many mistakes start being arisen such as the error bars exhibited in Fig.9 a.
Besides of using sediment of different colors and identify them easily with ultraviolet lights. How this method is novel with previous ones found in literature [1,2]?
Minor comments:
From line 164 to 170, it should be figure 3
Line 56 there is a typo easir.
References
[1] Houssais, M., Ortiz, C. P., Durian, D. J., & Jerolmack, D. J. (2015). Onset of sediment transport is a continuous transition driven by fluid shear and granular creep. Nature communications, 6(1), 6527.
[2] Assis, W. R., & Franklin, E. D. M. (2021). Morphodynamics of barchan‐barchan interactions investigated at the grain scale. Journal of geophysical research: earth surface, 126(8), e2021JF006237.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4669-RC2
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 171 | 60 | 18 | 249 | 63 | 18 | 18 |
- HTML: 171
- PDF: 60
- XML: 18
- Total: 249
- Supplement: 63
- BibTeX: 18
- EndNote: 18
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Please see the attached pdf for my comments.