Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4619
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4619
02 Oct 2025
 | 02 Oct 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion.

Potential of temperate agroforestry systems to deliver ecosystem services: an evidence map

Andrea Schievano, Camille Rubeaud, Margret Köthke, Beatrice Landoni, Damien Beillouin, Marta Pérez-Soba, Simona Bosco, Rui Catarino, Giovanni Tamburini, David Makowski, and Sonja Kay

Abstract. Agroforestry systems are promoted as multifunctional land-use strategies, yet evidence of their benefits, especially in temperate regions, remains fragmented. This umbrella review maps 42 meta-analyses to quantify the effects of agroforestry on environmental, climate, and productivity outcomes, with a focus on temperate pedo-climates. Our evidence map reveals a strong consensus on key regulating ecosystem services: a clear majority of assessments (over 65 %) reported significantly positive effects on soil carbon sequestration and multiple indicators of soil quality (154 results). In contrast, effects on provisioning services are more variable. However, the most reported metrics (e.g. single-crop yield) hardly represent the integrated provision of different food or non-food products on the same land, while more comprehensive indicators are rarely used (e.g. land equivalent ratio). Mapping outcomes to the CICES framework highlights several relevant knowledge gaps and a total absence of meta-analytical evidence for Cultural Ecosystem Services. Methodological quality was variable, with frequent shortcomings in reporting study selection and statistical analysis. We provide a list of 1500 primary literature references and a global map of geolocations highlighting the experiments available for temperate pedo-climates. This synthesis provides a robust evidence base for policymakers, pinpointing both established benefits and critical research gaps needed to fully leverage agroforestry in temperate regions.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Andrea Schievano, Camille Rubeaud, Margret Köthke, Beatrice Landoni, Damien Beillouin, Marta Pérez-Soba, Simona Bosco, Rui Catarino, Giovanni Tamburini, David Makowski, and Sonja Kay

Status: open

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Andrea Schievano, Camille Rubeaud, Margret Köthke, Beatrice Landoni, Damien Beillouin, Marta Pérez-Soba, Simona Bosco, Rui Catarino, Giovanni Tamburini, David Makowski, and Sonja Kay

Data sets

Datasets Andrea Schievano et al. https://data.jrc.ec.europa.eu/collection/id-00399

Model code and software

code for GPS coordinates extraction Damien Beillouin https://github.com/dbeillouin/GPS_Extraction

Andrea Schievano, Camille Rubeaud, Margret Köthke, Beatrice Landoni, Damien Beillouin, Marta Pérez-Soba, Simona Bosco, Rui Catarino, Giovanni Tamburini, David Makowski, and Sonja Kay

Viewed

Total article views: 86 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
57 26 3 86 5 2 2
  • HTML: 57
  • PDF: 26
  • XML: 3
  • Total: 86
  • Supplement: 5
  • BibTeX: 2
  • EndNote: 2
Views and downloads (calculated since 02 Oct 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 02 Oct 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 83 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 83 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 09 Oct 2025
Download
Short summary
To understand the true benefits of integrating trees on farms, we reviewed 42 meta-analyses and mapped primary studies. Agroforestry clearly boosts key ecosystem services like soil health and carbon storage, while boosting biodiversity. However, effects on food production are mixed, and many past studies lack quality. We found critical knowledge gaps: metrics related to provisioning services are inadequate and cultural services are entirely absent in meta-analyses.
Share