Proposing Sources for Discrete Groundwater Discharges to Patterned Pools in Three Regional Raised Northern Peat Bogs
Abstract. Raised northern peat bogs are generally assumed to be entirely precipitation-fed (ombrogenous), suggesting they are void of groundwater (minerogenous) inflow from underlying sediments. Patterned pools in raised bogs have often been attributed to surficial flow filling depressions along the peat surface that produces subtle differences in peat pore-water chemistry. However, we present evidence that certain patterned pools may be partially fed by localized upwelling of minerogenous groundwater from underlying glacial sediments in three northern peat bogs of Maine, USA. Underlying permeable glacial deposits, embedded in hydraulically confining glacio-marine clay deposits, were delineated using ground-penetrating radar and transient electromagnetic surveys. Paired point measurements of temperature and specific conductance (SpC) were surveyed around pools, and statistical relationships indicative of groundwater upwelling were established. Uncrewed aerial systems (UAS) thermal infrared (TIR) mapping was conducted, augmented by handheld TIR imaging, to examine characteristic groundwater temperatures in cold and warm seasons across pool surfaces. Surface water samples were acquired to assess the relationship between SpC/temperature signals and elevated iron and manganese concentrations that could be indicative of glacial aquifer sources. The combined datasets present evidence for localized upwelling in pools underlain by glacial structures, and the possibility of minerogenous groundwater contributions. Upwelling through the peat matrix is possibly partially facilitated by macropore, peat pipe’ features that serve as preferential flowpaths of varying lengths to the surface. Such upwelling could drive a positive feedback loop where elevated concentrations of ionic constituents repeatedly dilate the peat matrix and/or terminal electron acceptors enhance anaerobic respiration and microbial activity, accelerating the humification of peat around patterned pools and potentially magnifying carbon loss.
General comments
Very good research in the field of groundwater hydrology. Please, follow my guidance and the specific comments to fix the minor issues.
Specific comments
Lines 76-78. “Glaciofluvial esker structures have been modelled to exert changes in the vertical movement of peat pore water, attributed to changes in the topography of the mineral sediment along the base of a bog and the hydraulic conductivity (K) contrasts between eskers and lower K peat”. Insert review papers on flow heterogeneities in fluvial and glacial aquifers worldwide:
- Jansson, P., Hock, R., Schneider, T. 2003. The concept of glacier storage: a review. Journal of Hydrology, 282(1-4), 116-129.
- Agbotui, P.Y., Firouzbehi, F., Medici, G. 2025. Review of effective porosity in sandstone aquifers: insights for representation of contaminant transport. Sustainability, 17(14), 6469.
Line 97. Clearly state the general aim of your research at the end of the introduction.
Line 97. Describe the 3 to 4 general objectives of your research by using numbers (e.g., i, ii, and iii).
Lines 99-139. Insert quantitative information on thickness of your sedimentary deposits.
Lines 99-139. Insert quantitative information from cores on proportion of sand, clay and gravel in your sedimentary deposits.
Line 679-690. Expand the conclusion. The general meaning/impact of your hydro-geophysical research is not evident in these lines.
Figures and tables
Figure 2. Location not evident. Please, insert coordinates.
Figures 3 to 5. Distinguish a Figure A and B.
Figure 6. The difference between Figure A and Figure B is not clear.
Figure 10. Insert a spatial scale.
Figure 10. Specify if a vertical exaggeration if present.