Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4495
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4495
30 Sep 2025
 | 30 Sep 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Driving Mechanisms for Subsiding Shells in Simulations of Deep Moist Convection

Quinlan R. Mulhern, John M. Peters, and Jake P. Mulholland

Abstract. Downdrafts play an essential role in the feedback between convective clouds and their surrounding environment, and they must be properly accounted for in cumulus parameterizations (CPs). The mechanisms for downdraft formation are often debated in past literature and inconsistently represented in CPs. To address this uncertainty, we investigate the ring of descent surrounding cloudy updrafts known as a subsiding shell, a leading contributor to downdraft mass flux. We analyze two LES of deep convection in the Amazonian dry and wet season, using composite soundings from the Green Ocean Amazon Campaign. The dry and wet season soundings differ in their middle tropospheric relative humidity (RH), which facilitates an assessment of the influence of RH on shell strength. Kinetic energy budgets along trajectories reveal that shells acquire their descent from evaporatively driven negative effective buoyancy along cloud edge and downward oriented dynamic pressure accelerations associated with the toroidal circulations of updraft thermals. Consistent with observations, shell downdrafts were strongest in the dry season simulation. Contrary to hypotheses which attributed this difference to greater evaporative cooling, we find that dry season shell downdrafts associated with deep convection were stronger because of larger dynamic pressure accelerations in the dry season. However, when investigating cumulus congestus clouds, negative effective buoyancy accelerations become increasingly important relative to pressure accelerations. The stronger accelerations in deep convective shells were attributed to stronger dry season updrafts, and consequently more intense toroidal circulations within thermals. Our results provide a foundation of understanding for future improvement of downdraft representation in CPs.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Quinlan R. Mulhern, John M. Peters, and Jake P. Mulholland

Status: open (until 11 Nov 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Quinlan R. Mulhern, John M. Peters, and Jake P. Mulholland
Quinlan R. Mulhern, John M. Peters, and Jake P. Mulholland

Viewed

Total article views: 27 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
27 0 0 27 0 0
  • HTML: 27
  • PDF: 0
  • XML: 0
  • Total: 27
  • BibTeX: 0
  • EndNote: 0
Views and downloads (calculated since 30 Sep 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 30 Sep 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 27 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 27 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 01 Oct 2025
Download
Short summary
Thunderstorms redistribute air throughout the lowest layer of the atmosphere. One way in which this occurs is when air descends around the edges of clouds, known as a subsiding shell. By studying computer simulations, we found that the shells were formed by droplets evaporating at the cloud edge and air being forced downward at cloud top by pressure differences. Larger pressure differences and accelerations were found in the dry environment because updrafts were stronger in that simulation.
Share