Unlocking the potential of pollarded oaks: A 375–year hydroclimate reconstruction from northcentral Spain
Abstract. Pollarded trees—traditionally pruned and maintained for centuries near rural settlements—represent an untapped resource for climate reconstruction in Mediterranean lowlands. In this study, we evaluate the potential of 102 pollarded deciduous oaks from two communal woodlands (dehesas) in northcentral Spain as proxies for past hydroclimatic variability. Using the correlation between latewood and November–June precipitation, we reconstruct regional precipitation variability from 1649 to 2023, achieving calibration/verification correlations of 0.71–0.83 against regional and large-scale instrumental datasets. The reconstruction reveals pronounced interannual to multidecadal variability, with precipitation ranging from 250 mm to 815 mm. The longest dry spell lasted 25 years (1818–1842), while the wettest sustained period extended over 29 years (1953–1981). We identify 14 extremely dry years (< 298 mm) and 24 extremely wet years (> 592 mm). Extreme droughts during the pre-instrumental period coincide with historical records, such as Catholic pro pluvia rogations—ceremonies traditionally held in response to agricultural drought—in 1683, 1698, 1734, 1737, 1738, 1775, 1868 and 1898. Our findings demonstrate that pollarded trees, when sampled from sites with asynchronous management, preserve robust climate signals and provide reliable high-resolution information on precipitation variability across Mediterranean dehesas.
The authors present a new precipitation reconstruction for north-central Spain, notable for its innovative use of heavily managed oak trees. This study builds upon the group’s recent research, which analyzed growth patterns of pollarded oaks. The manuscript provides a strong demonstration of how reliable climatic signals can be extracted from such trees in very novel and robust approach.
My major concern relates to the effects of pollarding. It is still quite unexpected to observe such a small difference between the uncorrected and corrected RWI and LWI chronologies. As mentioned in the discussion, I agree with the authors that this is most likely due to the high replication and the asynchronicity of pollarding events among trees. However, this asynchronocity among events is not shown in the manuscript. I believe it would be valuable to include a figure showing how many trees were affected by pollarding over time.
Minor: