Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4470
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4470
18 Sep 2025
 | 18 Sep 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Can rime splintering explain the ice production in Arctic mixed-phase clouds?

Tomi Raatikainen, Silvia Calderón, Emma Järvinen, Marje Prank, and Sami Romakkaniemi

Abstract. Secondary ice production (SIP) can increase ice crystal number concentration (ICNC) by several orders of magnitude, particularly in clean clouds with low concentrations of ice-nucleating particles (INPs). The most common SIP process in models is rime splintering (RS) also called as the Hallett-Mossop process. The generally adopted RS-formulation gives 350 splinters per milligram of rimed ice at the temperature of 268 K. We used large-eddy simulations to examine if rime splintering could explain the high ICNC observed during the ACLOUD (Arctic CLoud Observations Using airborne measurements during polar Day) campaign where cloud temperatures close to 268 K are favourable for rime splintering. With the default model setup, the splinter production rate had to be multiplied by a factor ten to close the gap between modelled and observed ICNCs. Similar changes have been made in other modelling studies. The factor of ten multiplier helped to trigger SIP so that it became a self-sustaining process, fully independent of the primary freezing initiated by INPs. Our simulations reached realistic steady-state ICNCs and maintained stable mixed-phase clouds through the 24-hour simulation time. Additional sensitivity tests showed that the efficiency of SIP depends strongly on model parametrizations and air temperature, so that simulations with a modified setup were able to reproduce the observed ICNCs without the factor of ten multiplier.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Tomi Raatikainen, Silvia Calderón, Emma Järvinen, Marje Prank, and Sami Romakkaniemi

Status: open (until 30 Oct 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Tomi Raatikainen, Silvia Calderón, Emma Järvinen, Marje Prank, and Sami Romakkaniemi

Data sets

Brief description of the simulations, source code of UCLALES-SALSA, and the simulation data used in this publication T. Raatikainen https://a3s.fi/12001823-acloud-pub/index.html

Tomi Raatikainen, Silvia Calderón, Emma Järvinen, Marje Prank, and Sami Romakkaniemi
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 18 Sep 2025
Download
Short summary
We used high-resolution simulations to examine if rime splintering as the only secondary ice production process could explain the high ice particle concentrations observed during an airborne Arctic cloud study. We found that rime splintering can produce high ice concentrations in such relatively warm mixed-phase clouds, but some model adjustments may be needed. Clouds in our simulations reached realistic steady states where rime splintering became a self-sustaining process.
Share