Statistical Evaluation of Well Water Anomalies as Potential Precursors to Large Earthquakes
Abstract. Macroscopic anomalies such as well water fluctuations and unusual animal behaviour have been recorded in old documents and folklore accounts as possible earthquake precursors. However, no reliable earthquake prediction method based on such anomalies has ever been established. One of the reasons is that the same phenomena often occur independent of earthquakes. This study conducted a re-examination using shallow well water observation data recorded for eleven years by a volunteer observation network in Japan. While some critics have claimed that it was impossible to predict an earthquake using well water anomalies, especially shallow ones, the results suggest that some plausible anomalies may serve as true precursors. On the other hand, many anomalies were observed without associated earthquakes, and earthquakes without associated anomalies were also uncovered. The old documents and folklore may contain elements of truth, while unrecorded failures are hidden behind successful accounts. Credible anomalies were limited, and major earthquakes rarely occurred within the same focal region. Furthermore, maintaining systematic observations has been challenging. Even an eleven-year observation period was too short to empirically verify the feasibility of an earthquake prediction method for disaster mitigation. Therefore, continuous support is needed for empirical research on earthquake precursors.
Orihara has presented an interesting theory of using shallow well water fluctuations as precursors for earthquake events. They have compared data collected by a volunteer group in late 1970s and 80s to the occurrence of earthquakes during that period.
Based on my review of the manuscript, I do not believe that the analysis is comprehensive enough to support the author’s conclusions. There is no review of the accuracy of measurements, which had been collected over 3 decades ago. The analysis parameters such as selecting a threshold of 7 days, are fairly subjective. From the author’s own analysis, the results have high variability. Moreover the author has presented no reasonable hypothesis for the reasons behind fluctuations in shallow well water levels and earthquake occurrences. In this reviewer’s opinion, the data is too old, the collection and analysis too subjective, and the conclusions too inconclusive to warrant publication of this manuscript.
I have listed some additional comments below: