Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4402
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4402
17 Sep 2025
 | 17 Sep 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Ocean Science (OS).

Eddy kinetic energy and baroclinic and barotropic energy conversion rates along the Atlantic Water boundary current north of Svalbard

Kjersti Kalhagen, Ilker Fer, Till M. Baumann, Jon Albretsen, and Lukas Frank

Abstract. On the continental slope north of Svalbard, the boundary current carrying Atlantic Water (AW) loses heat as it flows eastward. This cooling cannot be fully attributed to atmospheric heat loss or turbulent mixing. Lateral exchange, potentially linked to mesoscale activity, has previously been proposed as a contributing factor, based on limited observations of eddies. Here, we analyse a year‑long dataset of hydrography and velocity observations from two mooring arrays, supplemented by output from an eddy‑resolving ocean model, to quantify the seasonal variability of eddy kinetic energy (EKE) and baroclinic and barotropic energy conversion rates over time-scales from days to months. Both EKE and conversion rates peak in autumn and winter, coinciding with the strongest boundary current and the warmest AW. Local EKE variability, however, is only weakly associated with conversion rates, suggesting advection from upstream generation sites or unresolved variability from limited measurements. Conversion is mainly baroclinic, indicating boundary current instability and providing conditions favourable for offshore propagation of warm-core eddies. The model underscores the need for adequate spatial and temporal averaging and reveals substantial conversion rates on the offshore, deeper side of the boundary current, with comparable contributions from baroclinic and barotropic processes. Resulting mesoscale activity likely enhances lateral stirring and heat loss from the boundary current, particularly in winter and spring, contributing to the along-stream cooling of AW.

Competing interests: Ilker Fer is a member of the editorial board of Ocean Science.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Kjersti Kalhagen, Ilker Fer, Till M. Baumann, Jon Albretsen, and Lukas Frank

Status: open (until 12 Nov 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Kjersti Kalhagen, Ilker Fer, Till M. Baumann, Jon Albretsen, and Lukas Frank
Kjersti Kalhagen, Ilker Fer, Till M. Baumann, Jon Albretsen, and Lukas Frank
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 17 Sep 2025
Download
Short summary
Warm Atlantic Water loses heat as it flows eastwards along the continental slope north of Svalbard. Year-long mooring records show the current is most energetic in autumn and winter, when it is the strongest and warmest. Also conversion from mean and potential energy to eddy energy peak in autumn and winter. An ocean model shows energy conversion also on the deeper, offshore side, suggesting eddies transport heat towards the basin, contributing to along-slope heat loss.
Share