Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4401
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4401
18 Sep 2025
 | 18 Sep 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).

Evaluating Turbulent and Microphysical Schemes in ICON for Deep Convection over the Alps: A Case Study of Vertical Transport and Model–Observation Comparison

Hemanth Kumar Alladi, Julian Quimbayo-Duarte, Luca Bugliaro, Johanna Mayer, and Juerg Schmidli

Abstract. The Alpine region experiences frequent deep convection during summer, driven by thermal and mechanical forcing associated with the complex terrain. Deep convection transports moisture into the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere, which affects the climate through its radiative interactions. It is poorly represented in models that rely on parameterized convection and lack adequate representation of boundary layer turbulence and microphysics. In this study, we investigate the evolution of moist deep convection observed on 8 July 2021 over the Alps using ICON simulations with explicitly resolved convection (horizontal resolution of 1 km). The simulations use two turbulence parameterizations the default turbulence kinetic energy (TKE) and the newly developed two turbulence energies (2TE) scheme combined with single moment (SM) and double moment (DM) microphysics schemes. The simulations are evaluated using cloud properties derived from MSG/SEVIRI satellite measurements. The sensitivity of cross tropopause transport to the choice of turbulence and microphysics scheme is examined. Although, the ICON simulations capture the observed diurnal cycle of convection and successfully simulate the overshooting cloud tops during peak convective activity, our results show that the choice of the turbulence scheme influences the temporal evolution and spatial extent of deep convection, while the microphysics parameterization has a larger impact on the hydrometeor distribution and on the cross-tropopause transport.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Hemanth Kumar Alladi, Julian Quimbayo-Duarte, Luca Bugliaro, Johanna Mayer, and Juerg Schmidli

Status: open (until 30 Oct 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Hemanth Kumar Alladi, Julian Quimbayo-Duarte, Luca Bugliaro, Johanna Mayer, and Juerg Schmidli
Hemanth Kumar Alladi, Julian Quimbayo-Duarte, Luca Bugliaro, Johanna Mayer, and Juerg Schmidli
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 18 Sep 2025
Download
Short summary
Thunderstorms can transport moisture into the lower stratosphere, affecting climate. Over mountains, models fail to represent them due to underrepresentation of turbulent mixing and cloud microphysics. This study evaluates the operational TKE and new 2TE turbulence schemes, with single and double moment microphysics, in the ICOsahedral Nonhydrostatic (ICON) model against observations. ICON-TKE shows stronger mixing than 2TE, the DM scheme shows taller storms with more ice and transport than SM.
Share