Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4371
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4371
01 Oct 2025
 | 01 Oct 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).

Identifying Snow-Covered Areas from Unoccupied Aerial Systems (UAS) Visible Imagery: A Comparison of Methods

Mahsa Moradi, Andrew G. Fleming, Adam Hunsaker, and Jennifer M. Jacobs

Abstract. High-resolution imagery from Unoccupied aerial systems (UAS) offers new opportunities for mapping snow cover at fine spatial scales, particularly in regions with ephemeral and variable snow conditions. This study evaluates a range of classification strategies for generating snow-covered area (SCA) maps from UAS imagery with 3 cm pixels collected over open areas in southern New Hampshire, USA and offers practical recommendations for producing UAS-derived SCA maps. We tested machine learning and threshold-based approaches, exploring the influence of input features and training set composition on classification accuracy and generalization. Results show that classifiers using full red-green-blue inputs, including Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Random Forest (RF), consistently yield high performance (accuracy, balanced accuracy and f1 score above 0.96) and transfer well across sensors and locations. In contrast, approaches relying solely on the blue band (including SVM, static and dynamic thresholding) exhibited lower balanced accuracy (0.83 to 0.86) and limited generalizability. Training with fewer than 12 orthomosaics reduced the reliability and consistency of snow cover classifiers. When fewer flights are possible, UAV flights that collectively capture the full range of snow-covered area (fSCA) between 20–60 %, partial melt, and refrozen surfaces, should be prioritized. We conclude that highly accurate snow mapping from routine UAS optical imagery is possible even in landscapes with variable snow cover and ephemeral, shallow snowpacks.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Mahsa Moradi, Andrew G. Fleming, Adam Hunsaker, and Jennifer M. Jacobs

Status: open (until 12 Nov 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Mahsa Moradi, Andrew G. Fleming, Adam Hunsaker, and Jennifer M. Jacobs
Mahsa Moradi, Andrew G. Fleming, Adam Hunsaker, and Jennifer M. Jacobs

Viewed

Total article views: 75 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
68 5 2 75 10 2 1
  • HTML: 68
  • PDF: 5
  • XML: 2
  • Total: 75
  • Supplement: 10
  • BibTeX: 2
  • EndNote: 1
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Oct 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Oct 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 75 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 75 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 06 Oct 2025
Download
Short summary
Images from Unoccupied aerial systems (UAS) allow us to map snow more accurately, especially where snow is shallow and does not last long. We used UAS with visible imagery and tested different methods of mapping snow (including a few machine learning methods) in open areas in southern New Hampshire, USA. We found that using the full color information gives the most reliable results. We showed how UAS surveys can be planned to create accurate snow maps, helping track snow in changing conditions.
Share