the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Methanogenesis by CO2 reduction dominates lake sediments with different organic matter compositions
Abstract. Microbial methane production is a respiration reaction involved in the terminal step of anaerobic degradation of organic matter. Due to the dependency of methanogenic substrate production on fermentation reactions that produce different end productions, different sources and compositions of organic carbon (OC) may impact the methanogenic potential in lake sediments. Here, we investigate the sources and compositions of OC in sediments of Lake Geneva and how both are potentially linked to methane production. Differences in dominant long-chain fatty acid abundances and carbon isotopic compositions suggest the predominance of diagenetically altered phytoplankton-derived OC at a profundal site and temporally highly variable sources of both aquatic and terrestrial OC in a deltaic location. Despite these differences, radiotracer-based methanogenesis rate measurements and stable isotopic signatures of methane indicate significant methane production that is dominated by CO2 reduction (>95 % of total methanogenesis) in both locations. Matching this interpretation, members of well-known CO2-reducing Methanoregula sp. dominate both sites. No clear effect of OC source on methane production rates was evident. Our data demonstrate that OC of diverse sources and diagenetic states support microbial methane production, but do not indicate a clear impact of the OC source on the dominant methanogenic pathway or the community structure of methanogenic microorganisms in lacustrine sediments.
Competing interests: At least one of the authors is a member of the editorial board of BG. The authors have no further conflicts of interest to declare.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.- Preprint
(984 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(518 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (extended)
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-437', Christian Knoblauch, 04 Apr 2025
reply
This manuscript presents data on the regulation of methanogenesis in two different sediments of Lake Geneva. The authors measured depth profiles of acetoclastic and hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis in sediments from a deep profundal and a shallower deltaic site and related these rates to sediment properties, biomarker abundance and isotope signatures, and the abundance and diversity of the methanogenic community. Despite significant differences in organic matter quantity and quality, and methanogen abundance, the authors found similar methane production rates, similar methanogen community composition and a clear dominance of hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis at both sites.
The manuscript addresses an important research question, presents very interesting and partly surprising data, and the results of the different approaches used provide new insights into the regulation of methanogenesis in lake sediments. The manuscript is well written and the conclusions are supported by the data. I have only a few minor suggestions to improve this very nice and readable manuscript. First, I found the discussion too long. It could be shortened considerably, especially by omitting statements about obvious facts (see examples below). Also, most of the conclusion is a summary of the results. Therefore, the last part of the conclusion can be revised (see below) and combined with the discussion.
Specific comments:
L45f: Is there another source of methane in lake sediments besides anaerobic decomposition of organic matter?
L77ff: This is a very long sentence that I had to read several times to understand. Perhaps it should be split into two parts.
L98: There are also terrestrial C4 plants such as maize
L273ff: What components have been quantified with this method?
L291ff: Please explain which depths were chosen and why.
L350: ‘below’ I could not find any information about methanogenic rates or the depths at which samples were taken. Please explain what depths were sampled for DNA extraction.
L374: The section on statistics is missing.
L484: The difference between the d13C values of CH4 and TIC is about 60, please explain in the M&M section how the fractionation factor was approximated.
L505ff: The second part of this paragraph should be in the discussion.
L681: typo: methanogenesis
L710f: What is meant by "low" in this context? The concentration of acetate seems to be higher than the concentration of any other low molecular weight fatty acid at the DS site. Also, it's difficult to infer the importance of an intermediate from its concentrations. "Low" concentrations may be due to high rates of degradation or low rates of production.
L739ff: This is a rather obvious statement that is probably not needed.
L782ff: This is a very general statement. However, it could not be supported by the current study.
L815ff: This is obvious since H2 and acetate are the main substrates of methanogenesis, not sedimentary organic matter.
Fig. 1 and Fig. 4: The acetate and DIC concentration profiles should be shown only once. In addition, the lines and symbols of different data should be changed to better differentiate between different parameters.
Fig. 5: Please align the methanogen groups with the tics of the respective columns.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-437-RC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
122 | 29 | 7 | 158 | 14 | 8 | 5 |
- HTML: 122
- PDF: 29
- XML: 7
- Total: 158
- Supplement: 14
- BibTeX: 8
- EndNote: 5
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|---|---|---|
United States of America | 1 | 47 | 30 |
China | 2 | 20 | 13 |
Germany | 3 | 14 | 9 |
Switzerland | 4 | 11 | 7 |
France | 5 | 11 | 7 |
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1
- 47