Broken 206Pb/238U carbonate chronometers and 207Pb/235U fixes
Abstract. Carbonate U–Pb dating has become a key tool for Quaternary palaeoclimatology and palaeoanthropology beyond the ∼800 ka age limit of Th–U disequilibrium dating. U–Pb geochronology is based on the paired radioactive decay of 238U to 206Pb and of 235U to 207Pb. Current carbonate U–Pb data processing algorithms rely mostly on the 206Pb/238U clock and attach little weight to the 207Pb/235U data. A key weakness of this approach is the need to correct the 206Pb/238U data for initial 234U/238U disequilibrium, which may cause an excess (or deficit) in radiogenic 206Pb compared to secular equilibrium. We introduce a new disequilibrium correction algorithm, using matrix exponentials. This algorithm can be used to undo the effects of U-series disequilibrium using either an assumed initial composition, or a measured set of modern 234U/238U (and optionally 230Th/238U) activity ratios. Using a deterministic Bayesian inversion algorithm, we show that disequilibrium corrections work well for relatively young samples but become unreliable beyond 1.5 Ma and impossible beyond 2 Ma. Using theoretical models and real world examples from Siberia, South Africa and Israel, we show that the uncertainty of the disequilibrium correction of such old samples exceeds the correction itself. Previous ‘Monte Carlo’ error propagation methods underestimate these uncertainties by up to an order of magnitude. We advocate the use of the 207Pb/235U isochron method as a more accurate and precise alternative to 206Pb/238U geochronology for >2 Ma carbonates that are suspected to have experienced significant levels of initial 234U/238U disequilibrium.
Competing interests: Pieter Vermeesch and Noah McLean are associate editors of Geochronology.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.