Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4297
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4297
16 Oct 2025
 | 16 Oct 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (NHESS).

Flood vulnerability models for damage assessment of artworks and cultural heritage buildings

Claudia De Lucia and Chiara Arrighi

Abstract. The assessment of flood-related losses to cultural heritage (CH) remains one of the most underexplored areas in flood risk management, largely due to the complexity of CH assets and their multiple, often intangible, values. In this study, extensive field data collection and archival research on artwork restoration costs were undertaken to support a synthetic approach for developing vulnerability models for both the building envelope and internal artworks across three primary CH asset types: places of worship, museums, and libraries. The methodology was applied to the historic city of Florence (Italy), enabling the derivation of mean and percentile vulnerability curves from a sample of 48 inspected CH buildings. For a 500-year flood scenario, estimated average losses amount to approximately €2.5 million for the building envelope and €3 million for artworks per asset, with total damages to CH in the city reaching approximately €550 million. While direct monetary loss estimates are subject to considerable uncertainty, the model results align well with available ex-post data, particularly for places of worship. These findings demonstrate that flood-related monetary losses to CH assets are far from negligible when compared to other damage categories, such as residential buildings, and therefore warrant increasing attention from the scientific and policy-making communities.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Claudia De Lucia and Chiara Arrighi

Status: open (until 27 Nov 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Claudia De Lucia and Chiara Arrighi
Claudia De Lucia and Chiara Arrighi

Viewed

Total article views: 37 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
33 2 2 37 1 1
  • HTML: 33
  • PDF: 2
  • XML: 2
  • Total: 37
  • BibTeX: 1
  • EndNote: 1
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 Oct 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 16 Oct 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 37 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 37 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 17 Oct 2025
Download
Short summary
Flood damage to cultural heritage is often overlooked, yet losses can be severe. A study in Florence found average damages of over €5 million per site in a major flood. By assessing both building and artwork damage, the research shows heritage sites are as more vulnerable than homes. Including them in flood risk planning is essential to protect their cultural and economic value and ensure informed, effective risk management.
Share