Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4296
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4296
06 Oct 2025
 | 06 Oct 2025
Status: this preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).

Heterogeneous future Arctic Ocean primary productivity changes projected in CMIP6

Léna L. Champiot-Bayard, Lester L. Kwiatkowski, and Martin M. Vancoppenolle

Abstract. The Arctic Ocean is experiencing profound environmental changes due to climate change, with Net Primary Production (NPP) broadly projected to increase this century. This study analyzes NPP trends and their drivers across pan-Arctic and sub-regional scales throughout the 21st century, comparing Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) and Phase 5 (CMIP5) projections to assess how model generations differ. Using a multi-model approach, we assess projections for different Phytoplankton Functional Types (PFTs), diatoms and nanophytoplankton, and examine the role of physical and biogeochemical constraints including light, nutrient, and temperature limitations. Our results reveal that Arctic Ocean NPP increases are primarily driven by reduced sea ice cover, leading to longer ice-free seasons in the expanding seasonal ice zone. However, NPP changes exhibit pronounced spatial heterogeneity, with strong increases in Arctic inflow shelf regions, tempered by decreases in Baffin Bay and Nordic Seas. These differences are due to the varying balance between physical and biogeochemical NPP constraints across the Arctic Ocean. The multi-model mean Arctic Ocean NPP increase is four times larger in CMIP6 than in CMIP5, under comparable radiative forcing, with a three times higher uncertainty at the end of the century. This difference is attributed to higher baseline nutrient levels in CMIP6, combined with more pronounced sea ice loss and greater warming than in CMIP5. Key aspects to better simulate future Arctic Ocean NPP remain the representation of present-day nutrient levels, light transmission through sea ice and reduced model uncertainty in climate sensitivity.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Léna L. Champiot-Bayard, Lester L. Kwiatkowski, and Martin M. Vancoppenolle

Status: open (until 17 Nov 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Léna L. Champiot-Bayard, Lester L. Kwiatkowski, and Martin M. Vancoppenolle
Léna L. Champiot-Bayard, Lester L. Kwiatkowski, and Martin M. Vancoppenolle
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 06 Oct 2025
Download
Short summary
To investigate the future of primary production, we analyzed outputs from several climate models. Changes vary greatly from one region to another: some areas show large increases, while others experience little change or even declines. These differences reflect the balance between water temperature, light availability, and nutrient supply. We also found that the newer generation of climate models projects a much stronger increase than previous models, but with greater uncertainty.
Share